Cocked and Locked

« August 2006 | Main | October 2006 »

September 26, 2006

Sleazy Politics

John Negroponte, the National Intelligence Director, stated on Monday that the war in Iraq may be creating new terrorist operatives, but remarking on leaked information from an intelligence estimate, rejected claims that the US is at greater risk of attack than it was in 2001. "We are certainly more vigilant. We are better prepared. We are safer," Negroponte said. His remarks came after the weekend disclosure of a high-level National Intelligence Estimate. The released document, and wouldn't we love to know who leaked it, fueled speculation from opponents to the Iraqi war concerning how the war has affected national security at home. Negroponte claims the report deals with global terror threats in a broad range of topics and does not concentrate on just Iraq. "The Iraq jihad is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives," he added. The Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Pat Roberts (R-Kan) says the public discussion concerning this report has given the American people the "false impression" that the National Intelligence Estimate deals exclusively with the war in Iraq. "This is not true," claims Roberts. "This NIE examines global terrorism in its totality." NIE 's embody a collective opinion from all 16 spy agencies of the US. The report is considered the voice of the American intelligence community. The New York Times first reported on Saturday that the highly classified assessment finds that the US invasion of Iraq has helped fuel a new generation of extremists and that the overall terror threat has grown since 9/11 which is counter from what President Bush claims is true. The Administration denies the media account that claims the NIE distorts the findings on global terrorism. Big mouth lout Nancy Pelosi yapped that bin Laden has not been captured, and President Bush should consider the intelligence carefully "before giving another misleading speech about progress in the war on terrorism." She and ten other dumbocrats asked House Speaker Dennis Hastert to hold hearings on the NIE's findings. President Bush today says he will declassify the NIE, and let people read for themselves the findings. That is good news. Any time the New York Times is involved with "security disclosures" you can be sure they are so eager to hang some evil on our President that they never get around to checking out the validity of the accusations. And, the Dumbocrats are so eager for the Times to be right, they follow like a bunch of lemmings. A new intelligence report claims that the war in Iraq has done nothing to reduce the terror threat to America. The Democrats are jumping all over it as proof that the Republican party is leading us down the road to destruction. For all you people who read this who are under 50 years of age, please don't be taken in by this lie. If you were alive during the Viet Nam war, you would recognize this as standard operating procedures of the Democrat party. I was in the Viet Nam conflict, and I witnessed first hand the antics by the traitorous Democrats during that war. You need to realize that the Democratic Party is not patriotic. If you look back in history, the Democrats have always sided with our enemies. People like Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Alec Baldwin and George Clooney, who make their fortunes in make-believe, somehow think they have the ability to dictate their goofy beliefs to the rest of us in the real world. As for the Democrats themselves, I have a picture of John Kerry making a speech standing in front of a North Vietnamese flag. His picture also hangs in Hanoi as a North Vietnamese hero. If you watched Fox News Sunday morning, September 24, 2006, you witnessed a Liberal Democrat in action. Clinton accused Fox News of a smear attack for asking a legitimate question about his failure to capture Osama bin Laden. Clinton flew into a rage and accused the "radical right" of accusing him falsely. Howard Dean blasts accusations that Democrats need to be more forceful about the truth. Neither Dean nor Clinton would know the truth if it hit them between the eyes with an axe. It was Clinton who "never had sex with that woman," and was impeached for perjury before a grand jury. During his testimony, it is stunning how often the President of the United States was unable to recall any pertinent facts. It was amazing he even recognized his own name. His entire administration was riddled with corruption and ineptitude. He surrounded himself with wackjobs who were just as goofy as he was. Remember Jocelyn Elders or Janet Reno? Need I say any more on the subject? Why do you think they vilified Senator Eugene McCarthy? If you really make a Liberal mad, and they want to get you, they start yelling "McCarthyism." McCarthy, in actuality, was an American hero, and while he was rather heavy handed in his accusations against socialists, the truth is, he was not wrong. The people he fought so hard to warn America about are now sitting in seats of power in both our government and our institutions of higher learning. Why do you think we have such dangerous "professors" teaching our children such nonsense as Bush blew up the dikes in New Orleans or Bush flew the planes into the World Trade Center? These people have an agenda, and that is not to be forgotten. Clinton is a proven liar, along with Dean, Kerry and Kennedy. Don't ever forget that.
Suppose we had fought World War II the way the Democrats want to fight the war on terror. It's January,1942. Our fleet lies in ruins in Pearl Harbor, and the Republican Minority Leader is calling for a Special Prosecutor to "get to the bottom" of what happened. The Republicans hold special hearings into what Roosevelt knew, and when he knew it. Peace demonstrators are marching in every city, and college professors say they have proof that Roosevelt pulled the pickle on the bomb that destroyed the Arizona. College students are holding rallies to "better understand" the feelings of the Japanese, and remind us all that shinto is really a religion of peace. The radicals are the ones who are training kamikazes, and "Banzai" is a word recognized by radical Shintoists. Plans are written to appease the Japanese by giving them the Hawaiian Islands without a fight if we can "just get along together." Republican Senators hold "special hearings" to determine why so many Marines are dying on Guadalcanal without any sign of victory. The Republicans are screaming for Secretary of the Navy Knox to step down for the disaster at Pearl Harbor, and Douglas McArthur is branded a coward and court-martialed. General Eisenhower is interviewed on the Senate floor and accuses the Secretary of War of dereliction of duty. The Republicans claim that Roosevelt lied about the Japanese peace talks, and demand his impeachment. Ultimately, through their traitorous behavior, the Republicans get their way, the Japanese swarm over the world, Americans stand trial for war crimes against Bushida, and millions are put to the sword. I think you get the drift here. I really hate Democrats. But, that is my opinion.

I have received a letter from a reader who suggested a couple of improvements to the war critique. They are as follows:

"The above story forgot that General Patton resigns and becomes an advisor for FOX News, and Montgomery goes to NBC, touting what a failure the Iraq encounter is."

This is exactly the type of feedback I'm looking for! Thanks much!!!

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:21 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

September 24, 2006

Lies and Truths…Bill and Osama

THE LIE:
Bill Clinton is busy angrily defending his “efforts” to capture Osama bin Laden and is accusing the Bush administration of doing less to stop him before the 9-11 attacks. In a heated interview today on “Fox News Sunday,” Clinton defended himself and his efforts to capture bin Laden following the murderous attack upon the USS Cole which occurred during his watch. He claims the criticism from “right-wingers” is unfair. “At least I tried. That’s the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now,” he said. “They had eight months to try, they did not try, I tried. So I tried and failed.” He went on to say, “I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill him.” ( This brings up another touchy subject which we won’t go into detail about at this time concerning accusations from the Left against President Bush. Suffice it to say that things are different if you’re a Democrat.) Clinton claims that he had battle plans drawn up to go into Afghanistan after the USS Cole attack. “Now if you want to criticize me for one thing, you can criticize me for this: after the Cole, I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban and launch a full-scale attack search for bin Laden. But we needed basing rights in Uzbekistan--which we got after 9/11." Clinton complained at the time that the CIA and FBI would not certify bin Laden was responsible for the USS Cole attack. It has also been suggested that Clinton was too distracted by Lewinsky to confront bin Laden.

THE TRUTH:
Sources in both Washington and the Middle East claim that Clinton turned down at least three offers involving foreign governments to help capture bin Laden after he was identified as a terrorist who was threatening the United States. Clinton himself has described his refusal to accept the first offer as “the biggest mistake” of his presidency. This according to a reliable, unnamed Washington source. Sudanese officials claimed late in 2005 that Washington turned down secret extradition from Khartoum in 1996. Former White House officials said they had no recollection of the offer, of course, but senior sources in the Clinton administration now confirm that it was true. In early 1996, America was exerting pressure on Sudan’s Islamic government to expel bin Laden who had been living there since 1991. It is now revealed that Khartoum sent a former intelligence officer with CIA connections to Washington with an offer to hand over bin Laden exactly the same way they had handed over “Carlos the Jackal,” another international terrorist, into French hands. At the time the State Department described bin Laden as “the greatest single financier of terrorist5 projects in the world” and accused Sudan of harboring terrorists. The extradition offer was turned down. A former senior White House source was quoted, “There simply was not the evidence to prosecute bin Laden. He could not be indicted, so it would serve no purpose for him to have been brought into US custody.” However, a former American counterterrorist figure claims there was “clear and convincing” proof of bin Laden’s conspiracy against America. In May 1996, American diplomats were informed in a Sudanese government fax that bin Laden was about to be expelled, giving Washington another chance to seize him. A former administration source says the offer went to the very top of the White House. The focus of American policy was to “discourage” terrorism, a much different thing from eliminating it, so Khartoum’s expulsion of bin Laden was in itself considered a clear victory. The White House was “delighted.” So, bin Laden took off from Khartoum on May 18 in a chartered C-130 with 150 of his followers, which included his wives, bound for Jalalabad in Afghanistan. On the way, the plane refueled in Qater, a friendly state to the US, but was allowed to proceed. A month later, on June 25, a 5000 pound truck bomb exploded in front of Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. This was a US military housing complex. The explosion killed 19 American servicemen. Bin Laden was suspected as the person behind the attack. Clinton will not comment on the accusation that he claimed this episode as the “biggest mistake of my presidency.” But a senior White House official acknowledged the Sudan episode had been a “screw-up.”

A second offer to get bin Laden came unofficially from Mansoor ljaz who was a Pakistani-American millionaire and a donor to the Clinton election campaign in 1996. On July 6, 2000, he saw John Podesta, Clinton’s chief of staff, to inform the administration that intelligence officers form a Gulf state were offering to help get bin Laden. The meeting has been confirmed in an exchange of e-mails between the White House and ljaz. According to ljaz, the offer involved setting up an Islamic relief fund to aid Afghanistan in return for the Taliban handing over bin Laden to the Gulf state and the US would get him from there. The Sunday Times has established that after a fierce internal argument between the White House and ljaz, the White House sent Richard Clarke, Clinton’s most senior counterterrorism adviser, to meet the rulers of the United Arab Emirates, who denied there was any such offer. Ljiz, however, maintains that the White House destroyed the deal, which was supposed to have been conducted only through unofficial channels. Ljaz claims that weeks later, he met his contact and embarked on a late-night ride into the desert who told him the Clarke’s front-door approach ruined the deal. “Your government has missed a major opportunity,” he recalls being told. Senior Clinton sources claim that ljaz’s offer had been treated in good faith, but the denial of the UAE government suggested it had no credibility.

A third more mysterious offer to help came from the intelligence services of Saudi Arabia, then led by Prince Turki al-Faisal. Details of the offer are still unclear, but by one account, Turki offered to help place a tracking device in bid Laden’s mother’s luggage who was seeking to make a trip to Afghanistan to see her son. The CIA declined the offer.

The Clintons are on a mission to regain the White House through the election of Hillary Clinton to the presidency. The truth is, she is the Liberal’s Liberal, and her voting record in the Senate proves it. The Clintons know that she will never be elected unless she pretends to be more centrist in her philosophy. Anything that shows the Clinton’s to be soft on terror or soft in the head must be refuted. If America is so stupid as to put the Clintons back in the White House, they deserve what they get. Americans must never forget that Islamists are are sworn enemy and they are hellbent to murder every one of us. I have the recording of Pearl and the other victims having their heads cut off with a knife. It is brutal beyond belief. If you have never seen it, you might consider watching it along with the destruction of the World Trade Center. These tapes are the best reminders of what the Islamists REALLY have in mind for every American. E-mail me at marshalwill_kane@yahoo.com and I'll forward it to you. Religion of peace my ass. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 10:57 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 23, 2006

F-14 Tomcat

A legend of American airpower retired yesterday. Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia was the place chosen for the final flight of the F-14 Tomcat. For those of you not in the know, this marvel of American ingenuity and military might began service with the U.S. Navy and Air Force in 1972. For almost 35 years, this warplane defended our interests at sea and in far off countries. It was the most feared aircraft in the sky, and the Russians built larger and faster bombers in an attempt to avoid this monster. It is to be replaced with the F/A-18 Super Hornet. A memorial to the Tomcat will be erected at my old station, Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia. While I never served with the Tomcat, the Phantom was front line in my day aboard the Enterprise during Viet Nam, it will always remain in my memories as the greatest warplane of my era. Good-bye, gallant warrior. You played a huge role in the downfall of the Soviet Evil Empire.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 08:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

War With Iran

Recently, the U.S. Navy issued a "Prepare to Deploy" command to several warships. Among these ships were a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters. The ships were ordered to be ready to go to sea by October 1, 2006. Also, the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) requested a review of U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf. The possible deployment of minesweepers has caused considerable excitement within the Pentagon. There are only a few places in the world where minesweepers are useful. The most significant area would be the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf where a considerable amount of the world's oil passes every day. The United States makes many plans to deal with a great number of possibilities around the world, and only a few are actually implemented. Yet there is a growing sense within the armed forces that an attack upon Iran is imminent. Most experts doubt that a war with Iran will include ground soldiers. The purpose of a war would be to take out Iran's nuclear facilities which could be accomplished by massive air attacks. Such a war has already been waged by Israel on Iran's nuclear plant in the past, and it could well be done again. The major objective would be to ensure the destruction of the target. The major obstacle would be retaliation from Iran such as an attack on Israel, disruption of oil supplies through the Strait, and shipping additional money and weapons to the Taliban in Afghanistan and Iraq. The targets would presumably have to be hit several times to ensure their destruction. This would lead to the inevitable "collateral damage" of civilian casualties which Liberals love to make a big deal over. If Iran should be successful in any retaliatory action, it could force the insertion of U.S. ground forces into the conflict. I am not opposed to war with Iran. I feel it is a matter of fighting them either before they have a nuke or fight them after they have it. I think it is infinitely better to take them out before. What I am opposed to is to fight the war in Iran like we are fighting it in Iraq. What I mean is, fight the war like you intend to win it. Looking back on World War II, it was assumed that we would inflict the maximum amount of damage in the shortest amount of time to the largest number of the enemy. That is how wars are won. Wars are NOT won by worrying about the deaths of civilians or worrying about damaging the infrastructure of the enemy nation. If you are going to be hamstrung by such considerations, then you don't start the war in the first place. Herein lies the quicksand problems we are presently facing in Iraq. Only one time in the first Iraq war did we fight like it was a war. That was "The Highway of Death." That battle was fought over a long road when the Iraqi army was trying to exit Kuwait and get back to Baghdad. Our aircraft killed EVERYTHING that moved on that road. Mile after mile of burned out trucks, tanks and other assorted vehicles lay strewn across the Iraqi desert. That was the only time we got it right in the Iraq conflict. There was only one reason why the Iraqi army was so completely destroyed. There were no "innocent" civilians around to hamper the killing. I believe that if we go to war, then let's use all those "wonder weapons" we pay through the nose to build. If we are not prepared to use them, then don't start the war in the first place. That is my only complaint over our present conflict in Iraq. We use rules of engagement detrimental to our ground forces. That is why we continue to suffer casualties. If we were prepared to destroy mosques where the enemy hides, destroy portions of cities where bombs are built, and generally try to KILL our enemy, we would actually make more progress in a war. Unless we are prepared to fight in that manner, don't start anything. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:34 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 22, 2006

What Makes a Citizen?

As a whole, the people of the United States have lost their sense of citizenship. Blame the ACLU, blame left-wing groups, right-wing groups, political parties, blame hours and hours of unrealistic dumb television programming. It really doesn’t matter. It is most likely a combination of most or all of those things causing the general malaise that our country suffers from when it comes to a feeling of belonging and oneness.

But how is citizenship defined? What makes a United States citizen a United States citizen? I believe one aspect is how we inform ourselves and vote. Sadly the majority of supposed U.S. citizens don’t even bother to vote and that alone says plenty about our state of citizenship. However, of the people that do bother to vote, I would wager precious few actually inform themselves on the issues and seriously think about what it is they are supporting or (as is recently the case) not supporting at the ballot box.

As American citizens, I believe it is our duty to vote for action, not inaction and not for critical rhetoric on actions already taken. We should demand candidates who provide specific actions (solutions) to or against, specific issues. As responsible citizens, we should accept nothing less.

As a responsible voting citizen, we should place priorities in a proper order. The American people come first followed by the good of the nation as a governing body, followed by the good of the individual citizen. Candidates today place all of their efforts in personal agenda and do not even discuss the American people as a whole or the good of the United States as a world power and governing body. People are stuck on the “me first” mindset and our irresponsible candidates use this underlying lack of citizenship to further their personal gain. People need to realize that a vote for freedom, a vote for the American people is also a vote for the individual citizen.

So where have we lost touch? I believe the most basic fundamental problem our country faces when discussing our citizenship is the disappearance of personal responsibility in public and private life. It has become commonplace, if not completely acceptable, to blame all of our problems on someone or something else. There are simply too many people too easily convinced that we’re not responsible enough to make our own decisions, nor can we be blamed when we make the wrong ones. It’s easy and convenient that way and, it goes without saying, this makes for very bad citizenship.

Our people also suffer from the disease of political correctness. We have somehow allowed our society to be bent and prodded by lawyers, special interest groups, minority groups, and the American Civil Liberties Union and to operate in an inoperable state. Our citizens as a whole are forced to adjust the flow of daily life based on a series of exceptional circumstances that, taken individually, benefit only a few. As a general rule, it has become politically incorrect to favor any group over any other group. It has even become incorrect to favor our own country (God help us) over any or all foreign countries. Who or what survives in the natural world without favoring them or itself? Political correctness is slow unwitting suicide.

Our citizenship is daily under a barrage of coercive manipulation from politicians and lawyers. Our minorities are made to believe that they are being discriminated against, not because politicians and lawyers care about stopping discrimination, but because it’s easy and it assures money and votes. Our country’s poor are made to believe that they are kept poor by big corporations and the rich that refuse to pay higher taxes for more government programs benefiting the poor not because the politicians and lawyers care about stopping poverty, but because it’s easy and it assures money and votes. Our citizens are willing slaves.

Our citizenship suffers from a lack of real leadership. Our political problems go beyond plain corruption in Washington. As a matter of principle, our leaders should be first and foremost citizens and second political leaders. They must place priorities in proper order. They need to classify their responsibilities to the American people as a whole, the United States as a governing body, followed lastly by their personal ideas and agendas. As citizens we must demand this of our leaders. We must demand that the ugliness and corruption in Washington cease so people with real character, ideas, and charisma can step up and lead our country. Washington is full of dull-witted phonies with absolutely no moral scruples or responsibility to their country. I am convinced that there are thousands of Americans that are more intelligent, responsible, and principled than the current lot of buffoons that call themselves law makers in Washington. They are simply unwilling to get involved in the corrupt, ugly, ill-spirited game that is modern American politics. We cannot be led effectively by leaders bent on personal gain.

What makes a citizen? A citizen is someone who demands their leaders to take actions that promote freedom and self accountability. A citizen helps his fellow citizens by simply being a good citizen.

Today we stand against an enemy that has vowed to convert us or crush us. They are serious in their intent and they are fiercely dedicated to their deadly agenda. I suspect that the majority of our so called citizens do not understand the gravity of this situation or the difficulties that face us as a nation. This enemy must be taken seriously.

We stand poised on the brink of a great struggle and we have neither strong citizenship nor strong leadership. If we do not demand true citizenship from our people and our leaders, we will fall. We must come together as a people, not as a political party, not as a governing body, but as citizens of the United States of America. To fail to do so will spell our doom.

Posted by RobF at 08:52 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 21, 2006

There Are No Terrorists in Iraq!

The Democrats have opted for a new attack policy to hit the Republicans with. Their old theme, "Culture of Corruption," didn't float because It was Democrat politicians such as Mayor Nagen and Congressman William Jefferson who were the corrupted ones. So, Ratface Reid has hit on a new attack plan...the brilliant idea that the war in Iraq is not a part of the war on terror. Gee, Ratface, this is really a brilliant attack plan. I'm sure this is going to have the Republicans cringing and running for cover. But, ahhh...ummmm...it's just a minor detail, but...if memory serves me correctly...didn't a federal trial judge named Harold Baer Jr., who was appointed by that lovable rascal Bill Clinton, examine legally admitted evidence of Iraq's duplicity in the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and assessed over one hundred MILLION dollars in damages? Come on, Ratface, this guy is one of your own cronies, so you can't scream foul play, either. But, maybe you can ignore this little problem with your plan. No one probably remembers, anyway. You can probably just sweep it under the rug like you always do. And that other little matter...ummm...gee, didn't Clinton's administration classify Iraq as a sponsor of terrorism because Mr. Hussein's government gave sanctuary and support to terrorist organizations? That would be during the 1990's when Mr. Uprightandmoral Clinton was a squatter in the White House. I'm sure with a few dollars in hush money, you can make that little problem go away, too. Speaking of money, I'm sure very few people remember that Saddam paid families of suicide bombers anywhere from $10,000 to $40,000 to have little Ahmad exit the world in a brilliant flash of lightning while screaming Allah somethingorother. Which brings to mind...ahhh...what's his name...Yasin...yeah, Abdul Rahman Yasin...there's a name that goes back a ways...1993, to be exact. Yep, pardner, he was an al-Qaida member who lived in Iraq in a home given to him by Saddam himself. Saddam even paid him a salary. All that payback and all he ever did was construct the bomb that was detonated at the World Trade Center in that year. And then there's Ramzi Yousef. You remember Ramzi, don't you? He was the chief planner of the of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the nephew of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, a kingpin of the infamous 9/11 attacks. Yousef came to America on an Iraqi passport. Golly, Ratface, seems like these little items could be considered as links between Iraq and international terrorism. Another minor point. Why don't we talk about what you Democrats said about Iraq and terrorism? Would you like to see your own words?

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -Bill Clinton

"For too long we've been told about "us" and "them." Each and every election we see a new slate of arguments and ads telling us that "they" are the problem, not "us." But there can be no "them" in America. There's only us."
-- Bill Clinton (This one really gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling. It proves how Democrats are unconscionable liars. Jimmy Carter really knows how to relate to this one.)

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Sept. 27, 2002. (Many years...tch...tch...tch)
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D- MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D- MA), Jan. 23. 2003

I really love this internet that Al Gore so brilliantly invented!!! It is so easy to track Liberal Democrat lies and misstatements. You'd think they would smarten up some. But that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:22 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Barbara Binks

Bad camera angle?

Posted by RobF at 09:59 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Question of Our Time

Thought I would post a link to a very intriguing article by David Selbourne. It's interesting to get a Brit's perspective on America's values, faults, and politics.

Posted by RobF at 09:09 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 20, 2006

E-Mail me...

To all my readers, if you have any feedback or ideas for new entries, feel free to drop me a line at marshalwill_kane@yahoo.com
Foul language or just plain idiotic letters will be disposed of. I am looking for honest, intelligent feedback. Hope to hear from you soon!
The Marshal

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 09:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Hugo Chavez at the UN

President Bush addressed the UN General Assembly yesterday with a forceful and honest speech which should have made all Americans proud. He laid out our goals in Iraq, warned our enemies, and informed the Islamic world that will not tolerate violence and terrorism. Today, The Ultimate, Greatest, Most Wonderful, He- Manniest, Grand Poobah of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, took the podium. Hugo was in top form, and should have made every wingnut Liberal in America very proud. In the grand style of Chucky Cheesy Schumer or Harry Ratface Reid, Hugo called President Bush "El Diablo" and said the podium still stank of sulfur from our President standing there. (Stupid Hugo, the sulfur stench is the bowels of hell opening to receive your fat ass.) Such rantings were greeted with laughter and outright glee from the General Assembly of the UN. People who call themselves Americans, and I don't mean Democrats, should be outraged by this display. What really irks me is the fact that Hugo was only mimicking the antics he sees on TV performed by the traitorous Liberal senators of America. His choice of words were slightly different, but the meaning and intentions were exactly the same. President Bush has been called just about every vicious name the Democrats can think of, and they need to be expelled from the Senate for their traitorous behavior during a time of war. The fact that Hugo could come to our own country and behave in such a spectacularly insulting manner speaks volumes about the Democrats. Jimmy Carter, with his openly poisonous mouth, has caused unspeakable damage to our nation's honor around the world. Every time a United States senator gets in front of a TV camera and starts spewing comments about how our President lied about Iraq and took us into a war encourages our enemies to emulate their sick behavior. The UN should be expelled from our shores, we should end every affiliation with that miserable organization, and we should build a large sewage treatment plant on the land presently wasted in Manhattan. We really need to mobilize the conservative base in America, wake them all up to the dangers we face in the world today, and remove every Democrat from every office across the nation. These people are just plain dangerous and need to go away. We need to make this election the worst disaster for the Democrat party they have EVER suffered. We CAN do it, but we ALL have to do our share. Tell your friends to visit cockedandlocked.net, make your cash contributions to your local Republicans running for office, volunteer your time to help get them elected. Help get the unregistered voters registered as Republicans, and help to ensure that every registered Republican can get to the polls on election day. Every vote counts. I know that for a fact. I lived in Florida and voted in the 2000 presidential election. I like to think that it was MY vote that put George Bush in the White House. Well, me and my wife, anyway. I have even framed my hanging chad! This promises to be one of the most important election you will ever participate in, and we really need to make sure the Democrats face a disastrous day at the polls. We need to send a message to the Chavez's of the world that their opinions and their socialist countries are not going to be tolerated. We need to start cleaning up our messes, and we need to start today. This is my opinion, and I hope it is also yours!!!

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:22 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Things I know - Chapter 1

-Hugo Chavez is a stooge
-The mainstream media still hates George Bush
-Liberal democrats value power more than our well being
-Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is breathlessly awaiting the 12th Imam
-The United Nations is a joke
-John McCain is a media whore
-My safety is off

Posted by RobF at 03:17 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 19, 2006

The Mute Swan...A Short Rant

Phantom Lake in Mukwonago, Wisconsin, has been home to a species of swan called the mute swan. Phantom Lake currently is home to approximately 40 of these beautiful swans. However, these is one teeney weeney problem concerning these birds. It seems they are not native to the area. In fact, they are not native to the state. And if that wasn't bad enough, they are not naturally found at all in the United States. They have arrived to this area from Europe, replacing the trumpeter swan, which IS native to the area. The mute swan and the trumpeter swan cannot co-exist because mute swans are a bit like Los Angeles gangs. They are aggressive and chase the trumpeter swans away. The mute swan has called Mukwonago home now for over 100 years, but that just isn't good enough. Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources has decided the mute swan has to go to make room for the native trumpeter swan. So, agents are preparing to shoot all 40 of the mute swans. Which brings me to my point...how come the government is so gung ho on protecting an American swan from an encroaching foreign swan, but refuses to protect an American citizen from an encroaching foreign wetback? Does the government place more value on an American swan than an American citizen? Another point. They don't plan to extradite the mute swans, they are going to SHOOT them, KILL them and MAKE THEM BLEED. Is this intended to prove that American government agents really are capable of violence against illegal aliens without having to face down an illegal alien? Why is it more important to protect a stupid swan than American citizens? Can anyone see any logic in this? Mark up another one for Liberal stupidity and political correctness. They are always wrong. But that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 05:53 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Jihad! Jihad!!!

Well, people, it's time to lock and load. Pass the ammunition, and keep your powder dry.

"You infidels and despotics, we will continue our Jihad and never stop until God avails us to chop your necks and raise the fluttering banner of monotheism." - Statement by Mujahedeen Shura Council

Al-Qaida claims its war against Christianity and the West will continue until it takes over the world and calls for more violence over the Pope's remarks. Referring to the Pope as "the worshipper of the cross," the statement continued, "you and the West are doomed as you can see from the defeat in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya and elsewhere...we will break up the cross, spill the liquor and impose the 'jizya' tax, then the only thing acceptable is a conversion or the sword." The "jizya" tax is a tax imposed on non-Muslims but converts are exempt. (At least we know why Democrats have a soft spot for Islamofascists. Islamofascists love their taxes, too.) The Pope's remarks have been cited as proof that the West is in a war with Islam. It is now incontrovertible proof that no matter what we say or do, Islam is our sworn enemy. By their own admission, their only purpose to exist is to chop our heads off, and they have no intention of stopping or giving up. Since September 11, 2001 Islamists have declared war on us numerous times. They have attacked us, terrorized us, mutilated us and murdered us. They have cost us billions of dollars in military expenses, and the loss of thousands of military heroes. We have sailors, soldiers and Marines in harm's way defending us against these ruthless cretins, and we have been labeled as outlaws because we are attempting to defend ourselves against their barbaric activities. America is like Gulliver. Individually, our enemies are powerless to inflict any real damage on us. But together, they represent a powerful enemy much like the Lilliputians who swarmed over Gulliver and tied him down with thousands of tiny ropes. We have Chavez in Venezuela, Castro in Cuba, Ahmadinejad in Iran, Kim il Jong in North Korea, and Annan in the UN. We have nations who should be our allies who have stuck a knife in our back such as France and Germany. We also have Americans who do not behave like Americans such as Jimmy Carter, who should be shot for treason. There are numerous members of the Senate who are more interested in their own power than what is good for our nation, people like Reid, Schumer, Kerry and Kennedy. Each one of these parasites are taking a little slice out of us, and cry "FOUL" if we punch back. They are like a pack of hyenas worrying an impala to death. It's about time we throw off these shackles and start acting like the leader of the free world. If we refuse to stand up to these miscreants, we can look forward to a future of continued terrorist activity, attacks upon our institutions both here and abroad, innocent blood shed and war. (If every Moslem were to vanish from the face of the earth, almost every conflict in the world would end.) I am reminded of the Indiana Jones movie where Indie is faced with a sword-wielding Arab type who swishes the blade back and forth in front of Indie's face to intimidate him. Indie's response is to pull out a very large gun and blast the Arab. Well, we need to be a lot more like Indie. If Arabs want to chop our necks, then we need a very big gun. Indiana Jones became almost a national hero. How come our hero can only be make-believe on a movie screen? Why can't we really kick some Arabic bottom and be done with it? Until the day arrives when we finally decide to kick some Arab teeth out, we will have an Arab sword at out throats. Gotta go. I have to clean my Winchester.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 05:50 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

The Pope and the Arab People

"Al Qaeda militants in Iraq vowed war on "worshippers of the cross" and protesters burned a papal effigy on Monday over Pope Benedict's comments on Islam, while Western churchmen and statesmen tried to calm passions. The statement by an umbrella group led by Iraq's branch of al Qaeda came after the Pontiff said on Sunday he was deeply sorry Muslims had been offended by his use of a medieval quotation on Islam and holy war."
This news item from NewsMax.com was on my news service page this morning. I'm sorry, but can someone please explain to me why the Pope should be making an apology, and exactly what he needs to apologize for? It seems to me that by this time, it should be obvious to even the most obtuse of Liberals that there is no way the Moslems of the Middle East are not going to be offended. If you say Allah, they are offended. If you draw a picture of Allah, you have to die. If you read a quote from eight hundred years ago, they go on a killing rampage. They have hacked people's heads off with a knife in the past, and not one word in protest over their vicious, inhuman acts. They have mutilated their own people, forced their women into virtual slavery, stuck explosives on their own children. Iraq is full of mass graves from their killing each other. They have used weapons of mass destruction upon themselves. They put a death warrant out on Salmon Rushdie for writing a book of their horrible behavior. Now, as if all that wasn't enough, they vow war against all worshippers of the cross! (PSSSSTTT...if you are a Christian, that's you...) What is wrong with the people of America today? Why are we as a nation acting so incredibly STUPID? What is so hard to understand that the people of the towelhead persuasion want to KILL US? It's time for all Americans to wake up to the fact that political correctness is going to put you into an early grave. We are so absorbed with this aversion of offending someone, that we are willingly stepping into the grave for our murderers. We don't want to call young Moslem men terrorists, so we refuse to profile young Moslem males at our airports. We don't want to offend any people of the wetback persuasion who invade our country (after all, they might not vote for us) so we are forced to endure increased crime, excessive stress on medical and educational systems, and having illegal aliens tell us how we must behave. Not to mention the outrage of "Press 1 for English." Have you ever wondered why the immigrant of today is incapable of learning English? It is either because they are too lazy, too stupid or they have decided that WE have to learn SPANISH. We have porous borders which allow anyone to enter, we have no laws to deal with them after they are here, we have three quarters of the world out on a mission to kill us all, and we go about as ignorant sheep unaware that our lives are hanging by a thread. I find it bizarre that we had over three THOUSAND people murdered in one day by our self-proclaimed executioners, and we refuse to even address them as enemies. It is a very real possibility that until a nuclear device actually detonates within our borders, kills 2 or 3 million people, devastates our capability to grow food, poisons thousands of square miles of land, and opens us up to foreign invasion, we will refuse to address the problem that people want us all dead. Maybe if such an attack actually occurs, we'll finally wake up to the reality of the world, and learn the hard way just exactly what being at war really means. What is really ironic about the whole thing is this. Suppose the Moslems have their way, and they come up with a super weapon that kills every "infidel" in the world and the Moslem people are left to inhabit the world. The sheiks and rulers of the Moslem world have grown accustomed to their luxury automobiles and they live in palaces that are air conditioned. They have almost anything their heart desires. Well, Mr. Sheik, what do you think your life is going to be like after your Jihad is successful and you have managed to kill all of us off? Do you think your people have the knowledge or desire to build even ONE automobile? Another point. Arab has been killing Arab for thousands of years. Without Western civilization, you won't have new aircraft or tanks because you don't know how to build one. Are you going to go back to chucking spears and making those silly curved swords like Sinbad uses in the movies? Are you really that anxious to go back to living in tents as nomads and eating goat and riding on a camel? You need to realize that all your stupid country possesses is a bunch of rocks and lots of sand and sun. (And oil, but that’s useless without something to burn it.) You have never invented anything even as simple as a screwdriver. What do you think your life will be like without Westerners to make your life worth living? The fact is, the only thing you have contributed to the world is the Arabic numeral system, which is not indispensable, and the world would not even miss you if you were to vanish from the earth. That is the main difference between our lives. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 03:42 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 16, 2006

Self Evident Truth

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Please take a few moments and really, REALLY ponder the meaning of these few words. Do you know where they come from? They can be found inside the most important document that pertains to American government, the Declaration of Independence. It speaks of truths that are “self-evident,” meaning that these truths are so obvious, they can be recognized at truth just by contemplating them. These words speak of a Creator, a word that has been capitalized because it is a pronoun for God, which argues against separation of church and state. It mentions just three rights; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Please note, it does not guarantee happiness, but the pursuit of happiness. These three rights are next written about in the context of securing them through a Form of Government which derives its power from the consent of the governed-meaning you and me. Next comes another very interesting section. When any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and replace it with a new government. This brings us to the last part, which I wish to expound upon.

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Despotism. This word evinces everything evil to the Founding Fathers. Despotism is a word to describe rulers who are self-centered and self-serving. Despots rule with an iron fist, caring nothing for the governed. The Declaration states that the governed has the duty to throw off a despotic government and to provide new guards for their future safety and security. I wish to propose the question. If our elected officials, who were empowered to represent our best interests, are more concerned with their future position within the government than with the job we elected them to do, are we obligated, is it our DUTY, according to the Declaration, to throw off such government? I have written a letter to my Senators on numerous occasions asking 3 simple questions which neither Senator Santorum nor Senator Specter will address. I have posed my questions in this manner: “Senator, you took an oath of office when you became a United States Senator. This oath requires you to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. ONE, what is the definition of a domestic enemy, TWO, who determines the proper response to a threat from such an enemy, and THREE, will such an enemy be brought to justice? Both my senators refuse to answer me. I believe that over the past 50 years or so, our government has moved so far toward becoming a despotic tyranny, we would be like a brand new nation if we were to return to the type of existence intended by the Founding Fathers. The Federal government has become such a bloated, uncontrollable behemoth, no one person is capable of understanding the whole. The tax code is so convoluted, not even H&R Block can guarantee no mistakes. The Judicial branch of government is completely out of control, and has become the second legislative branch. And, if this wasn’t bad enough, the executive branch, both Republican and Democrat, has become so engrossed with self empowerment and attempting to destroy the other party, they have lost all touch of why they are sitting in the Capitol Building to begin with. Make no mistake, I have many issues with the Republican Party, and they are making huge blunders at this time. But I still maintain that the Democrats are just plain evil, and need to be booted out of all elected offices. Tempers across the country are getting red hot, and people are getting fed up with the antics going on in Washington. People are outraged over the Supreme Court decisions such as eminent domain, Each party’s verbal attack is getting more outrageous all the time, and Watergate seems like trivia compared to what’s going on today. America can’t even be united over an enemy that wants to destroy us. I am forced to consider that possibility that average citizens are going to have to make the conscious decision to put a stop to all this soon, and it won’t be through the voting machine.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:12 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 15, 2006

Fixing Illegal Immigration

Here is my solution to the illegal alien situation. I believe we need
to mobilize all the true Reagan Republicans in the United States and
welcome every Mexican who wants to come here either legally or illegally.
The main object is to get them here. There are several incentives we
can use to persuade them to come into the United States. For instance,
we can use the recent Supreme Court ruling permitting the government to
steal our property to ensure every Mexican a free house upon arrival.
Also, we can grant every immigrant access to free health care, a free
college education and never have to pay a cent in taxes. Once every
Mexican is inside the United States, every Reagan Republican would quietly
emmigrate into Mexico.
Once inside Mexico, we would build a nuclear waste barrier along the
entire border. The purpose is not to keep them from getting back out,
but to keep them inside. We then allow nature to run its course.
The entire population of the United States would consist of Liberal
Democats. Liberal Democrats embrace homosexuality. The dramatic increase
in AIDS coupled with the decrease in the birth rate will rapidy reduce
the population in the United States.
With every Liberal Democrat embracing abortion, the dramatic
eradication of the future generation will further reduce the population at a
rapid rate.
With every Liberal Democrat renouncing Christianity, and embracing
every moonbat religion, especially Islam, the population will be rapidly
decreased due to the death penalty being imposed upon the perpetrators of
even very minor crimes.
With every Liberal Democrat embracing the idea that every child
molester, murderer, rapist and police killer is simply a misunderstood
individual, they will quickly empty every prison cell and mental institution
in the United States. This will result in a widespread wave of violence
and murder the likes of which the world has never seen. This will
further reduce the population very rapidly.
In my estimation, it will take about five years for America to become a
disease-ridden, death filled cesspool of corruption and decay. In
these same five years, hard working, freedom loving Reagan Republicans will
have turned Mexico into a thriving, vibrant industrialized power. We
will then be able to re-enter the United States, invest another five
years in cleaning up the mess left by Liberal Democrats, and make Mexico
the fifty-first state. In this way, we will have increased the
industrial base of the United States by about fifty per cent and also gained
access to precious oil reserves. The beauty of this is, there won't be
any looney Liberal Democrats telling us we
can't drill for it. And, we won't have to go up into the cold Arctic
regions to do it. Let's hear it for the Liberal Democrats, the Party of
Death.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 09:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 14, 2006

America's Top Cop

Caricopa County, Arizona is home to the "Toughest Sheriff in America," Joe Arpaio. He describes himself as "an equal opportunity incarcerator." With an approval rating of 85%, here is a man whom the Republican Party should take some pointers from. Of course, the Liberal community does not like him (hence the 15% who don't approve) because he treats criminals as criminals. (I learned a long time ago, if something makes a Liberal mad, there is a 93.8% chance I will like it.) Sheriff Arpaio has gained natiowide notoriety recently for many of his views on what jail time should be like. He is probably best known for building "Tent City," which is his jail that can be found out in the middle of the desert. 2,000 inmates call this place home. Arpaio built this jail using World War II-style army tents. It is located in a barbed-wire compound guarded 24 hours a day by armed correction officers. He has faced numerous lawsuits from groups opposed to treating criminals like bad people, but he has successfully weathered each storm to date. "If our soldiers fighting the War on Terror in Iraq are sleeping in the scorching desert in tents while serving our country, then why should criminals complain? What do they think? This is the Ritz? It's a jail!" he says. "Living in Tent City isn't any rougher than it is for our soldiers, sailors and airmen that are serving right now -- and they didn't commit a crime!" declares Sheriff Arpaio. Ya gotta love his style! He has other controversial aspects to his jail system. He has a self-appointed posse consisting of 3,200 private citizens, some of whom are armed. He has deputized these people numerous times to help fight crime in Maricopa County. Jail inmates are required to wear pink underwear. There are no girlie magazines, coffee or cigarettes found inside the jail. Television consists of The Weather Channel and Disney. He wants the inmates to know how hot it will be the next day because they are required to work on chain gangs. It was brought to his attention that he could be accused of discrimination, so he also has female chain gangs. Each inmate is fed for the cost of just 45 cents a day. The inmates have to pay for their meals, too. He bought Newt Gingrich lecture series on videotape that he pipes into the jails. He was asked if he also had and lecture series by a Democrat. He replied that if he played anything like that, it would not do anything to keep the inmates from returning in the future. He also wants the people of his county to know that he will always accept new inmates. He hung a "vacancy" sign up at his tent jail. In 1997, the U.S. Justice Department sues Sheriff Arpaio, alleging excessive use of force by guards. Reluctantly, the Sheriff settles the suit by promising to stop hog-tying inmates. In 1998, he installs "pup tents" into the jail. These are reserved for teenage inmates. Following the 9-11 attacks, he ordered American flags painted in 2000 cells. If an inmate defaces it, they are punished. Seems like at least one person in America still realizes criminals shouldn't be treated as guests of the state. It's refreshing to know that Sheriff Arpaio is on the job. Keep up the good work, Sheriff! Hopefully, someday soon you will be able to house an infamous Democrat when he is sentenced for treason. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:25 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 13, 2006

A Short Rant...Karl Rove

Over the past 5 years or so, the Bush White House has been roasted over an open fire concerning Karl Rove disclosing the identity of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative in a political vendetta. For most of that time, no one ever seemed to be interested enough to inquire into whether the accusations were true. Truth, you must remember, is not important to a Democrat. The Democrats came to the decision that this issue was enough to "get Rove" and that's all that mattered. Sidney Blumenthal, a former Clinton aide, wrote a book entitled "How Bush Rules: Chronicles of a Radical Regime," which includes a section that says Rove confirmed to Time magazine's Matt Cooper Plame's identity. Blumenthal jumped on this as proof of political payback. American Prospect's cover story in August 2005 stated that Rove is a bully who "stifled those who might have revealed his secrets." Well, here it is a year later, and golly, shucks, whatdayaknow, Plame's identity was not bandied about by Karl Rove or even one of his friends, but by Richard L. Armitage who happened to be a deputy secretary of state at that time. Naturally, the Bush White House was accused - falsely - of orchestrating the leak of Plame's identity to ruin her career to punish Mr. Joseph Wilson, Plame's husband, an Iraqi intelligence critic who opposed the war in Iraq. Typically, the Democrats (remember, they don't politicize anything) have been screaming for Karl Rove to resign. Or, at least they were, until Armitage was identified as the culprit in the whole affair. Now, suddenly, not a peep out of the Democrats. It's like they never said a word. Do you think they could possibly utter an apology about their sad behavior? OF COURSE NOT, they are DEMOCRATS! They never apologize for anything! They don't even admit they were wrong! Yeah, I really hate these people.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:01 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Politicizing the Iraqi War

Typical of the Democrat party, once again they come out swinging at shadows. They contend that President Bush had used a prime-time address commemorating the 9-11 attacks to make partisan arguments bolstering support for the Iraq war. At last, one Republican responds in a credible fashion. "I wonder if they are more interested in protecting the terrorists than protecting the American people," said House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH). "They certainly do not want to take the terrorists on and defeat them." In response, Pigface Pelosi, who also cried "inappropriately political," called Senator Boehner's criticism "cynical tactics." How easy it is to take remarks made by Democrats and prove them to be just plain stupid. America is in a war, and to think that President Bush won't mention it during a speech is nothing short of sheer idiocy. Besides, what do you think the dopey Dems would say if President Bush avoided Iraq? It would have been something like, "President Bush, side-stepping his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief, avoided any mention of the conflict raging in Iraq." This is typical Democrat demagoguery. Besides, do they really want to talk about politicizing national events? If this is the road down which they wish to go, let's talk about New Orleans for a minute. Did they not literally stampede over each other in their mad rush to get in front of TV cameras to spout out their politicized remarks over the misfortunes of the people of this stricken city? Not to mention the outrageous lies they told about planting explosives to blow up the dikes, or failing to send assistance while overlooking the despicable actions of Mayor Nagen and Congressman William Jefferson, who was too busy rescuing his bundle of cash to be worried about something as trivial as drowning Americans. Politicizing national events? How about we talk about turning the funeral of a Senator who died in a plane crash into a "Let's Bash Bush" party that was televised nationwide. Talk about sickening behavior! Or, should we mention the matter of turning the funerals of slain American servicemen, who died defending us against terrorists, into political statements to turn Americans against President Bush? When Democrat anti-war supporters demonstrate outside churches during funeral services for fallen American servicemen shouting such obscenities as a million more men should die, I would say this could be construed as "highly political behavior." Remember Cindy Sheehan, the mother of the fallen soldier who camps out in front of President Bush's home in protest? Ummm...could that be construed as political grandstanding? The fact that Turban Durbin appeared on Fox News this morning to complain about politicizing 9-11 is politicizing. The difference is, President Bush was rightfully addressing the nation about a critical topic. Turban Durbin, Ratface Reid and Pigface Pelosi were again aiding and abetting our enemies by fomenting dissention. Continuing their moan over politicizing 9-11, Democrats also complained about two conservative groups, Progress for America and the Center for Security Policy, running ads last week backing President Bush's policy and telling voters to vote "as if your life depends on it." Gee, do you THINK??? I mean, WHO WANTS TO TRUST A DEMOCRAT WITH NATIONAL SECURITY?????? Democrats went further by asking their Republican associates to delete a portion of a commemorative resolution that names a law that Congress passed in the wake of the terrorist attacks. Can you guess what law that would be? If you guessed USA Patriot Act, you get a gold star! Yes, the upright and honest Dems don't want us to be reminded of the Patriot Act. WHY? Because it was Ratface Reid who stood before the cameras bragging that "they killed the Patriot Act." Gee, Ratface, if you were so proud of that accomplishment, why are you so anxious for us to forget about it now? You people have no redeeming qualities. You should have been born in the Soviet Union or Cuba. You would have been right at home. Presently, the White House is attempting to enact new anti-terrorism laws, but certain senators are resisting, saying they will not give President Bush a "blank check" to wage war on terrorism. Please, someone explain, how are we ever going to win a war against terrorists if the government is not allowed to fight? National defense is one of the few things the Federal government is constitutionally allowed to participate in. Why is no one screaming to get the government out of public education or heath care as hard as they want it out of national defense? Oh, yeah, that's right...it's a Republican administration. I forgot. If it was Bubba Clinton, who sucked up to Arafat all the time, it would be a different matter. You remember Yassar Arafat, don't you? He was that consummate terrorist who was always treated by the Clinton White House as royalty. Yeah, Arafat, who personally made millions of dollars from terrorism, and was responsible for bombing American embassies and killing American diplomats. But we are supposed to turn our security back over to these people. We must not. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 05:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

News, Oh, Yep Yep Yep

CBS Evening news - Headlines and Commentary with your perky host, Katie Couric.

Posted by RobF at 10:31 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 12, 2006

Terrorists Continue to Terrorize

While President Bush solemnly visited the sites where Muslim jihadist murderers slew 3000 innocent American citizens, Al-Qaida marked the occasion by posting new video footage of Osama bin Laden urging his fellow murderers to prepare and steel themselves for "martyrdom." Hamza al-Ghamdi, who flew the second aircraft into the World Trade Center, is featured on the tape. He is encouraging his fellow terrorists with, "O, Allah water the tree of jihad (holy war) with our blood. O, Allah accept us as martyrs. I say to America if it wants its armies and people to be safe, then it must withdraw all its forces from Muslim land or else it should prepare coffins and big graves." Gosh, sounds just like a religion of peace to me! Such kind, loveable people. Gamdi posed next to miniature aircraft while taping this obscenity. Part of this tape aired on Al Jazeera (anyone surprised?) on Thursday, and included was ol' Osama (or as Ted Kennedy says, Samabama) himself telling the leaders of the 9-11 attacks to "talk yourselves into martyrdom operations, encourage yourselves a lot. At the beginning you will not be used to the idea and you will think it is a difficult thing." Gee, what encouragement! Imagine, martyrdom might be a hard thing to do! Hey, Osama, you louse, why don't you tell the truth. I don't see you hurrying to enjoy the pleasures of a bunch of hairy-legged, skinny broads wrapped like mummies. (Yuck, that sounds disgusting.) You are just an evil piece of camel dung, and you will be brought to justice, if the Democrats don't interfere. The terrorists hit the American embassy in Syria this morning. They attacked with hand grenades, automatic weapons and a car bomb. Fortunately, the car was unable to get past a barricade, and it also failed to detonate. Unfortunately, a Syrian guard was murdered, and several were injured. It was also reported that a Chinese diplomat was also slightly injured in the failed attack. Yesterday marked the fifth anniversary of the WTC attack and the day was marked by memorial services across the country. Services included reading the names of the murdered victims and ringing a bell for each. A very touching thing to do. The only problem is, it does nothing to stop it from happening again, and it does nothing to make the murderous scum pay for their actions. I have no interest in listening to a bell ring for a relative who died in the North Tower. What I want to hear is the sound of a trap door being activated as a terrorist hits the end of a rope with his neck. I am tired of hearing that "it's not a question of if we will be hit again, it's a question of when." Well, I don't think we have to be hit again, if we start doing things a little smarter. In my opinion, present airport security measures are a joke. Bleeding hearts crying over mistreatment of prisoners in Gitmo need to shut up and keep their stupidity to themselves. Instead of ringing bells, I want to hear gunfire, exploding bombs and terrorists screaming as U.S. Marines dispatch them off to Allah. I want the terrorists to be so terrorized, they never come out of their snug little caves. It is not a pleasant thing to comprehend, but I'm afraid that the United States needs to consider the possibility of preemptive war. It should be painfully obvious to any American who realistically looks at the world that countries such as Iran are committed to their goofy religion in the respect that all infidels, meaning anyone not committed to their goofy religion, needs to be exterminated. This includes, of course, YOU. And all of Israel. And all of England. And all of everybody that doesn't scream "Allah Ahhhkk-BAR!" or however it's spelled as they pull the pin of a suicide belt or rams a car full of explosives into a group of innocent people. I'm tired of stupid Liberals whining about the rights and feelings for people who want to kill me. I'm tired of idiots like Chucky Cheesy Schumer and Ratface Reid opening their mouths to complain about President Bush and not do anything to make me safer. I do not trust Democrats with my safety. Bill Clinton made it so I will NEVER trust a Democrat again. If Hillary Clinton is ever put back in the White House, we as Americans needs our collective heads examined. Bill was completely inept at national security, and every Democrat is just as bad. He sold national secrets to China, for crying out loud. I firmly believe that America is smarter than installing Democrats back in power. I think we are much better than that. But, it's also my great hope, and it's just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 09:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Flash Back

A quick point on September 12... I still openly weep with a mix of sorrow and venomous anger whenever I see the images of 9/11 (despite the mainstream media's efforts to effectually sensor them lest they motivate us to hate our enemy).

I suppose this quick flashback represents my feelings in a nutshell.

Posted by RobF at 08:38 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

9/11 Reflections

Many have said that our nation changed on September 11, 2001. They claim that we learned lessons and were filled with resolve.

My Grandparents and Great Grandparents withstood the threat of fanaticism and hatred in their time. They recovered from the horror and feelings of vulnerability following the attack on Pearl Harbor. They fought bloody battles in places like Midway, Guadalcanal, North Africa, The Phillipine Islands, and Okinawa. They stood by while thousands of U.S. troops were killed in a single day in places like Iwo Jima and Normandy. They bought war bonds, donated blood for wounded soldiers, and worked long hours in factories building the machinery of war. They learned hard lessons and most of them understood what it would have meant to lose A global war against fanaticism and hate.

Today, five years after the national tragedy and disgrace that was September 11, 2001, I do not believe that we have learned lessons and I do not think that the majority of Americans are full of resolve. I believe that our culture of entitlement has made us complacent and soft. I believe that our national security is undermined by the debilitating disease that is political correctness. I believe that the biggest obstacle that the United States of America faces in the war on terror is our own government.

Our leaders in Washington have shown time and time again since that fateful day that they hate each other more than they hate the enemy responsible for killing more than 3,000 Americans five years ago.

Posted by RobF at 07:32 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 11, 2006

September 11, 2001 to September 11, 2006

Today marks the fifth anniversary of the worst attacks ever committed against our nation on domestic soil. In those attacks, over 3000 people were murdered, and millions of dollars in losses were sustained. I am sick over the fact that so many Americans have forgotten what happened on this date five years ago. Well, maybe not forgotten, but have become uncaring. Americans need to remember that the enemy we face today is every bit as dangerous and dedicated to our demise as any German Nazi or Japanese soldier we faced 65 years ago. The biggest stumbling block we must overcome in this present war is the fact that many of our enemies are located within our own borders. These enemies go by the name of Democrats. Democrats have opposed the United States in its wars so many times in history that it has become accepted behavior, going back at least as far as the Civil War. Benedict Arnold did nothing worse than what Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi or Howard Dean are doing today. If these people had done these same antics during the Revolution, George Washington would have charged them with high treason, hanged them, and they would have been put in unmarked graves to be forgotten forever. Instead, the likes of John Kerry (D-MA) has his picture hanging in a museum in Hanoi, and called a hero of this Socialist nation. Yet he considers himself a United States Senator. It makes me gag. Today’s enemies include Hollywood names the same as the war of which I fought in Viet Nam. Instead of my enemies, whose names include such vermin as Jane Fonda, forever remembered as Hanoi Jane, today’s enemies are George Clooney, Sean Penn and Susan Sarandon. The Democrats love to holler and complain that it isn’t right for us to question their patriotism. I not only question their patriotism but their sanity. These people are true Socialists, and every decision they make is designed to destroy capitalism in this country and install their version of Utopia, also known as Communism. Everything they have done over the past five years has contributed to the support of radical Islam, giving aid and comfort to our sworn enemies who want to kill every American. I don’t question their patriotism because they don’t have any. I question the squeamish behavior of the rest of us who refuse to call traitors what they are, and bring them to justice. Our war against Islamofacists would be a lot easier if these people were not aiding them. They should face a military tribunal, which they oppose so hard, convicted and hanged in the Capitol Rotunda. From there, they should be cremated and their ashes scattered in the wind. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 01:47 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 08, 2006

"Bungle Bubba" says, "Pull it or else!"

"Bungle Bubba", what a perfect name for Slick Willie. Seems like he's on the warpath right now over a miniseries titled "The Path to 9/11" which is scheduled to be aired on September 10 and 11, the fifth anniversary of the Arab attacks on our nation. The movie includes a close-up of Willie stating categorically that he did "not have sex with that woman," referring to Monica Baby. The insinuation is that the scandal which led to his impeachment was interfering with his handling of security issues. Not surprising...Monica's security didn't do too well, either. So, Willie sent off a letter to ABC demanding they pull the miniseries if they don't "correct all errors it contains. The content of this drama is factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate and ABC has the duty to fully correct all errors or pull the drama entirely," reads the letter, written by Bruce Lindsey, head of the Clinton Foundation, and Douglas Bond, a top lawyer in Clinton's office. The letter, which has been obtained by the New York Post, also charges that the miniseries is a "fictitious rewriting of history." Well, I have to admit, this may be the truth. I mean, when it comes to fictitiously rewriting history, these people are pure experts, so they must know what they are talking about. They did it every day for 8 straight years! There is one thing that bothers me a little. Clinton's aides have seen only a trailer from the six-hour miniseries, and from this little snippet of the whole, they have come to the conclusion that the entire movie is grossly incorrect. Now, from my personal experience, most trailers I've seen are only a minute of so in length, and you end up with very little information concerning the story being related. However, they also received reports from political cronies who claim to have seen it. One scene is reported to have National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, also know as Hot Pants Sandy, denying authorization to CIA agents about to capture bin Laden in Afghanistan. Willie's letter claims that "no such episode ever occurred." Sandy Burglar is supposed to have approved the capture, but CIA boss George Tenet put a halt to the entire operation. Sounds like a game of "hot potato," doesn't it? Here are a couple of interesting facts. First, in a 2002 speech to a Long Island business group, Willie related in great detail a 1996 offer from Sudan for bin Laden's return to the United States. This speech was recorded by the Long Island group who hosted the event. It was also recorded by NewsMax.com. In 2004 Willie told CNN that he once confessed to turning down an offer to have bin Laden arrested prior to 9/11, but stated the his admission at that time was "not accurate." Good heavens, lying comes so easily to Democrats. This sounds exactly like a flip-flop from our favorite flimflam freak, John Kerry. To a Democrat, it's not a matter of IF they lied; it's a matter of WHEN they lied. That way, in their mind, all lies are actually truths, because they were just not being accurate. You may call it a lie, but to a Democrat, it's just an inaccuracy. What a pile of poop. Clinton told Christiane Amanpour of CNN, and I quote, "What I said there was wrong, what I said was in error." Golly, gee whiz, I didn't lie...it was just a mistake. OK, Democrats, I have a question to ask you that pertains to national security, and to my personal safety. How can I tell when you say something that it is factually true? You admit to being habitual liars, so I have to assume at all times that what you are saying are a lie. In their mad scramble to put a halt to the miniseries, the Senate Democrats sent a threatening letter to Disney, whose subsidiary is ABC, demanding that the movie be cancelled, never to be aired. Here is the final paragraph of that letter:
"Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon. Sincerely, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin, Senator Debbie Stabenow, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Byron Dorgan"
This from a pack of proven liars. And they are worried about the reputation and trust of the United States Senate. It's enough to gag a maggot. I sure don't see any such anger over or concern over the reputation of America's government about a docudrama presently being produced by a British filmmaker that begins with a very realistic depiction of the assassination of President Bush, which takes place in Chicago in the year 2007. I don't see Harry Ratface Reid up in arms about this happening to his President, especially in a time of war. I bet he'd feel different if I made a movie about him having his head cut off with a dull knife by an American Patriot...
Over the past few years, President Bush has been called a liar, tyrant, dictator, criminal, Nazi, warmonger and other choice slurs. No outrage over this, not even during a war. A columnist for The Guardian wrote about Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wilkes Booth and John Hinckley Jr. asking, "Where are you now that we need you?" In 2005 an art exhibit called "Patriot Act" displayed a postage stamp with a picture of President Bush with a pistol pointed at his head, and in 2006 the Looney Liberal group Code Pink carried a sign calling for Bush's assassination. The docudrama, entitled "Death of a President" is expected to be distributed in both Tehran and Damascus. And I thought Britain was an ally who owed us something for WWII... Anyway, all this proves that my disgust and rejection of the Democrat party is understandable, (it depends on what the definition of “is” is) and America needs to consider all Democrats as a mortal enemy. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 05:55 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 07, 2006

Dear Barbara Knight...

"I think history will show him to be the worst president since Ulysses S. Grant," said Barbara Knight, a self-described Republican since birth and the mother of three. "He's been an embarrassment."

Ms. Knight is speaking of President Bush. She is a lady from a Southern state. From this short description, we have few facts to work with, but we can make several assumptions based on national averages. First, I am very surprised she even knows the name Ulysses S. Grant. Being a mother of three, I would assume her age to be about 30 years. This would mean she graduated from high school about 1992, if she even finished school, which is not a sure thing. American history is not exactly a top notch subject in public schools and in fact, 90% of high school kids today cannot name the Vice President or Secretary of State. Things were not any better in 1992, either. So, I am forced to make the assumption that someone told her about Ulysses S. Grant in a rather less than complimentary way. Personally, if someone was to compare me to Grant, either as the President or as General, I would be mighty flattered. General Grant, actually, has always been a personal hero of mine. The Union army was commanded by a George McClellan. To have an understanding of what McClellan was like, you can equate him to General Wesley Clark. One day, Lincoln (another mildly famous Republican President rarely spoken of in public schools) told George that he wanted to "borrow" the army, and took control of it himself. General Grant was building a reputation as a fighting general. He also had his detractors, mainly democrats. He was accused of being a drunk, and not fit or capable of running the army. Democrats were all for defeat during the Civil War, too. Lincoln said he could live with the drinking as long as he could fight and win. McClellan, meanwhile, being a good Democrat, did everything he could to sabotage the war effort. He became the darling of the peace crowd ( there really is nothing new under the sun, as the Bible says ) and ran as the Democrat nominee in the presidential race. He lost, thank you Lord. Eventually, Grant beat up on the South so much (which is why Ms. Knight probably doesn't like him,) that General Robert E. Lee finally asked Grant for terms for surrender. This is where General Grant's real brilliance shows. He would not give General Lee terms. He told Lee he must surrender his army unconditionally. This is a very powerful statement. Previously, when an army realized it was facing defeat, it would ask for terms for surrender. The prevailing army would graciously grant the defeated army some mercy. Grant, however, would not give any incentive to Lee to surrender. He had to surrender unconditionally. Do you understand the meaning of this? In other words, once Lee surrendered his army, Grant had the power to have the entire army shot if he wanted to. He could have buried them alive or done anything he wanted to do. The surrender was UNCONDITONAL!!! Why did Grant demand UNCONDITIONAL surrender? Because he knew that if an enemy surrendered in such a humble fashion, they would KNOW that they had been completely defeated. There would be no doubt as to who the victor was. THAT is why Grant demanded unconditional surrender. The entire world would KNOW that the Union had been completely victorious over the South. Unconditional Surrender became U. S. Grant's nickname. His idea of victory became the benchmark for American military power. Germany surrendered unconditionally in both World Wars. Japan surrendered unconditionally aboard the USS Missouri. Until Viet Nam. Viet Nam marked the beginning of the end of true American power. This marks the ERA OF LIBERAL AMERICA, also known as the end of American global leadership. This marks the beginning of America ceasing to be "the bright and shining city on the hill," of America being the wall beyond which evil was not permitted to go. When America ceased being a moral, just nation, America ceased being a nation that the rest of the world looked up to. Once we allowed millions of our own citizens to be murdered before birth, we became a morally bankrupt society. Once we said that homosexuals are just another type of family, we became a nation that threw away its right to be called 'just." When we kicked God out of our schools and government institutions, we became an island in a sea of wickedness. Once we allowed miscreants such as Ted Kennedy and John Kerry to dictate our morality when they have none, we became a nation that has no moral compass. But I am wandering from my main point...

On the surface, for Ms. Knight to equate George Bush to Ulysses S. Grant seems rather vague and obscure. If public schools won't educate pupils about Lincoln, they aren't likely to mention Grant. But this is where scheming Democrats show their true colors. Grant ordered General Sherman to invade the South, and Sherman did a very marvelous job of it. His famous "March to the Sea" is still a textbook operation. Sherman burned every Southern city he entered, his army pillaged for food and provisions, and basically starved the South into submission. Thus, to Ms. Knight, Grant becomes an embarrassment because Grant fought a war in such a way that victory was achieved. He is an embarrassment because to the lunatic left, the last thing they want is victory. They don't even want a draw. The only thing that is acceptable to the wacko left is utter and complete defeat for America and America's military. Democrats hate the military, and always have. Defense spending means less money for their hairbrained needs such as welfare, abortion and other government programs. Americans need to realize that Democrats should be their mortal enemies. Democrats do NOT care about you, your family or your dog. All Democrats care about is their own welfare and their power. Power is everything to a Democrat. If they can make you dependent upon them for anything, then you have empowered them. You have made yourself a slave to the Federal government. Unless you are among the Democrat elite, you should consider them your worst nightmare! If you are among the Democrat elite, you are the nightmare. Democrats want a one-world-government because they are socialists. If they weren't such liars, they would tell you they despise democracy. Democrats know if they were to tell the truth, they would never be elected to anything, so they have to pretend to be something different. Every election, they have to put on an act that they are patriotic and are strong on defense and freedom. Nothing is further from the truth. That is why Harry Ratface Reid brags about killing the Patriot Act. That is why halting the NSA wiretapping operation is so important to Nancy Pigface Pelosi. That is why American heroes in Iraq are accused of being murderers and rapists. That is why they are not allowed to wage war like they were trying to win. Political correctness is national suicide by strangulation. We are so worried about offending someone, and some many people are willing to be offended, that we are killing ourselves. American Marines are called murderers and rapists, but not a word is said about some towelhead cutting the head off an innocent hostage with a dull knife. Too bad a bunch of the Democrats in the Senate don't make a trip over there and become hostages. But, that is just my opinion.

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 05:53 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 06, 2006

Who Said That????

I thought we might play a little game today. See if you can identify who said the following quotes:
"The defeat of American forces in Beirut in 1983 is proof America does not have the stomach to stay in a fight. In Somalia, the United States pulled out, trailing disappointment, defeat and failure behind it."
If you said Osama bin Laden, you're right.
"History teaches that underestimating the words of evil and ambitious men is a terrible mistake. Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. The question is: Will we listen? Will we pay attention to what these evil men say?"
Did you say President Bush?
Here's another...
"Because President Bush lost focus on the killers who attacked us and instead launched a disastrous war in Iraq, today Osama bin Laden and his henchmen still find sanctuary in the no man's land between Afghanistan and Pakistan, where they still plot attacks against America."
This comes from the traitor John Kerry (D-MA)
Try another!
Heavy as they are, the cost of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people. And mark my words; he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them and he will use them."
Did you guess President Bush? That would be wrong. This epic proclamation comes from that icon of Liberal goo, none other than Bill Clinton. Hey, Bill, I'm "marking" your words...
"Pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq would fulfill the terrorist leader's wishes and propel him into a more powerful global threat in the mold of Adolf Hitler."
President Bush would be correct.
There are plans for a "media campaign to create a wedge between the American people and their government so the people will pressure their leaders to retreat in the fight."
This comes from a letter from bin Laden to Taliban leader Mullah Omar. Scary, huh? This sounds just like a page out of the DummycRATS playbook. This could be Ted Kennedy's quote, so if you guessed Kennedy, you get a half point.
"Death is better than living on this earth with the unbelievers among us." Bin Laden.
"If President Bush had unleashed the American military to do the job at Tora Bora four years ago and killed Osama bin Laden, he wouldn't have to quote this barbarian's words today."
Senator John Kerry. Gee, I thought he said President Bush is a warmonger. This guy has no clue what he is talking about. He is basically just an idiot.
I think you get the point. People, we are less than two months away from election day, the democRATS are berserk traitors, and they are willing sell their souls to regain their power. We also need to realize that these are the same bums who gave us defeat in Viet Nam, and they are running true to form. They have no concept of national security. These are the people who are in rapt joy over killing the Patriot Act. These are the fools who want to stop the NSA wiretap surveillance program. They are the traitors who want to appease the Islamofascists who want to kill you. These are the rampant moonbats who accuse American soldiers of murder, war crimes and brutality. They want to accuse President Bush of horrendous crimes, but are silent about crazed towelheads beheading innocent kidnapped hostages. The Dumbocraps whine about no progress in Iraq, but refuse to recognize the successes of the deaths of Saddam's sons or the takedown of Zarquawi. They even failed to rally around the capture of Saddam, claiming it was a political grandstanding stunt. These are the same people who stood on the Capitol steps and sang "God Bless America" to us, all the while wishing to remove God from every facet of American life. Dumbocraps are shallow, vile, dangerous people who really have no concept of right or wrong. To them, everything is measured by how many votes it will gain them. Abortion is socially correct murder, homosexuality is a socially correct behavior, and illegal immigration is socially correct expansionism. 53 Dumbocraps in the Senate and House are certified Socialists. Socialists used to be the sworn enemies of America. They now make our laws for us. They refuse to face the fact that we are at war with an enemy who wants to kill us, and the Manchurian Candidate could be a reality come November. As a veteran of the Viet Nam war, I know first-hand the way Democrats work, and why they do the stupid things they do. Democrats have to appeal to the weak-minded, the weak-kneed, the weak-hearted and the weak-spirited. These are the only people who can find acceptance with their cock-eyed views. If you are weak-minded, you think government should provide for your every need. If you are weak-kneed, you are an appeaser who thinks you can talk a terrorist out of killing you. If you are weak-hearted, you see no harm in killing a baby who has not drawn its first breath. If you are weak-spirited, you are one of the goofs who embraces scientology or some other nut-ball "religion," or you scream and cry if you hear the name Jesus. Democrats are the dregs of American life, and socially have no redeeming qualities. They are traitorous by nature, and historically have been, going back at least as far as the Civil War. I can't prove it, but I'd be willing to bet that Benedict Arnold was a registered Democrat. I don't like them, I don't trust them and they cannot be given the responsibility of my safety. I am not clairvoyant, but I will go on record right now with a prediction. Hey, Bill, MARK MY WORDS...I predict that if the Democrats win back the Senate and the House this November, they will begin impeachment proceedings against President Bush. This will mean Washington will be embattled with court proceedings which will impede our President from waging a war. The Democrats will demand that we leave Iraq, we will again be forced into a defeatist reputation, and our enemies will be singing praises over our demise. If this is not bad enough, I also predict that within one year of this, they will again strike our nation in such a way that 9-11 will look like a minor event. Meanwhile, Harry Ratface Reid will still be gleeful over wrecking the Patriot