Cocked and Locked

February 23, 2007

Why A President Clinton, Obama Or Any Other Democrat Would Be Disasterous

"All quiet along the Potomac."
General George McClellan, prior to the first battle of Bull Run

The White House is constantly under attack from Democrats suffering from "Bush Under Looney Liberal Senatorial Hatred (which) Immitates Terrorism" (BULLSHIT) and the Democrats are no longer capable of dealing with any foreign problems such as a war. This is due to their weird associations with every crazy and illogical goofy organization. Are you an animal rights goof? Then you are a LIBERAL! Are you a queer? Definitely, you are a LIBERAL! Do you believe in killing unborn babies? Yep, LIBERALISM is for YOU! Are you working to take God our of our country? You guessed it, LIBERAL is your moniker! Waiting for the Mother Ship in orbit to beam you up? You can catch a ride with Tom Cruise. Just take your Socialist Democrat card for ID, you liberal, you! On the upcoming Earth Day, Algore will welcome you home, your tree-hugging Democrat. This is why Democrats cannot deal with something as serious as a war. Their weird ideas won't let them. Look at how weak Carter was when confronted by the Iranians. For over a year, he was as helpless as the baby in the womb he was in favor of killing. Clinton? We hardly need to rehash his inept handling of terrorism. Khobar Towers...USS Cole...North Korea acquiring nukes...the first Twin Towers...if we, as a nation, should have the misfortune of being burdened with a Democrat president, things would be infinitely worse the second time around. I can safely make this claim for a number of reasons. First, the Democrats insist on treating the war on terrorism as a law enforcement issue. When terrorists are active against us and foment hate attacks against American interests, it is not feasible to capture them, take them to this country to stand trial, and give them their civil rights as if they were American citizens. That is just stupid behavior. Ronald Reagan said, "Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong." The Kane Equation states, "If Democrats appear foolish and cowardly, this invites increased terrorist attack." Over the past 6 years, the Democrats have consistently fought against every measure that would ensure victory against terrorism. They have emasculated the Patriot Act, the Homeland Security Agency and the secret wiretapping of terrorist groups. They have cried "profiling" when the agencies charged with our defense have tried to defend us agains Arab males. This weak-kneed treason simply invites more terrorist activity against us. When Joe Lieberman was defeated in the Democrat primary last year, the Democrats sent a message, "if you are serious about defending America, it will cost you your cushy government job." Since the example made of Joe, Democrats are more reluctant than ever to take a stand for America's defense. We also need to remember that, in their souls, Democrats are Socialists, not capitalists, so to them, a war on terror is nothing but a big pain in the butt that is distracting them from the real issues such as socializing the economy, raising taxes, promoting gay marriage and abortion, and other crap. I for one am a bit sick of hearing that global warming is more likely to kill me than a young Arab male with an attitude. Bottom line? If you have a party in power that thinks this crap is more important, than our military is in the crapper, our lives are in danger, and Americans all over the world will be killed. If the armed forces are used to advance our interests, or even to protect our own borders, for crying out loud, the Liberals whine and moan. But they have no problem sending them off to some hellhole that has a chance to give them a feelgoodfeeling. That's why Iraq is evil, but the Sudan is righteous. Then there's the UN. With nations such as China, France and Russia in cahoots with every one of our enemies, we need the UN like we need that knife at our throat. Since the Democrats demand UN "sanctions" for everything that concerns American interests abroad, we might as well admit that any foreign policy is irrelevant. This is in line with the Democrat need for international acceptance of everything we try to accomplish overseas. Europeans are weak militarily, they have a history of pandering to their enemies, engage in stupid international law and think their own crap doesn't stink. Yet, every time we depend on them for anything, they let us down and are completely worthless. We would be better if the entire European continent slid silently into the sea. A Democrat president would be hampered by involvement with the UN. If a Democrat wins the White House, America's intelligence programs will again be destroyed. We will be open to foreign attack and terrorists will have freedom to kill us. The price our nation, and our allies, the ones the Democrats don't scare off, if any, will pay in blood will be awful. Mark this blog down for future reference and see if I'm wrong if the Democrats infest the White House.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 04:16 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 22, 2007

The Dark Secret About Barack Obama

"Come on boys! Give them the cold steel! Who will follow me?"
-Brigadier General Lewis Armistead, CSA, July 3, 1863

Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill) threw his hat into the political ring for President of the United States on February 10, 2007. As the freshman Senator and the Democrat on a meteoric rise within the ranks of the rank Democrats,he is on a pilgrimage to replace President Bush. Obama gave the keynote address at the 2004 Democrat convention before his election to the Senate, and recently appeared on a Time magazine cover. He is being recognized as a viable alternative to Madame Hillary, who is increasingly looked upon as a flipflopper in the image of John Hanoiboy Kerry. Obama has promised to "change our politics" with him becoming the first black American president in U.S. history. The question is: what kind of change would he bring to America if he should be elected? Recently, the ultra left and the godless Liberals have embarked upon an attempt to redefine abortion as "social justice." The fact that abortion kills over 3200 Americans per day or 1.2 million per year is becoming a mite bit embarrassing to the murderous left. This is a crisis that the Left wishes to ignore, but deserves the attention of every American policy maker and leader. Liberals want to push their agenda on issues such as poverty, education, health care, fair wages, and the war in Iraq. They want abortion to be forgotten. Obama shrugs off abortion issues because he has a long record of forgetting the pre-born children. He does not wish to be associated with the fact that over 1400 black babies lose their lives EVERY DAY in abortion murder mills. He even supports the killing of born and partially born children. He claims to stand for justice but denies that justice to the most innocent members of society, the unborn children. Minority women make up only about 13% of the female population aged 15-44 in the United States, but they suffer approximately 36% of all abortions in this country. Black women are three times more likely as white women to have an abortion. The dark secret is Obama has a 100% perfect rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood ( an organization whose founder called blacks "human weeds") for his support of abortion. This murderous rampage against the children has resulted in a horrendous loss of life. It has been estimated that since 1973, black women have suffered about 10 million abortions, and without that loss, the present population of blacks in America would today be higher by about 35%. Abortion has swept through the black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member. A 1993 Howard University study showed that black American women over the age of 50 were 4.7 times more likely to get breast cancer if they had any abortions compared to women who had not had an abortion. The following graph shows the comparison of death by abortion to other leading causes of death. Obama does NOT want people to see this graph...especially the black population.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 03:02 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 21, 2007

Three Speeches to Contemplate

This is a speech from General George S. Patton. Please beware, the language is for adults only, because he was a fighting man, and spoke as such.

"Men, this stuff that some sources sling around about America wanting out of this war, not wanting to fight, is a crock of bullshit. Americans love to fight, traditionally. All real Americans love the sting and clash of battle. You are here today for three reasons. First, because you are here to defend your homes and your loved ones. Second, you are here for your own self respect, because you would not want to be anywhere else. Third, you are here because you are real men and all real men like to fight. When you, here, everyone of you, were kids, you all admired the champion marble player, the fastest runner, the toughest boxer, the big league ball players, and the All-American football players. Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser. Americans despise cowards. Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor will ever lose a war; for the very idea of losing is hateful to an American. You are not all going to die. Only two percent of you right here today would die in a major battle. Death must not be feared. Death, in time, comes to all men. Yes, every man is scared in his first battle. If he says he's not, he's a liar. Some men are cowards but they fight the same as the brave men or they get the hell slammed out of them watching men fight who are just as scared as they are. The real hero is the man who fights even though he is scared. Some men get over their fright in a minute under fire. For some, it takes an hour. For some, it takes days. But a real man will never let his fear of death overpower his honor, his sense of duty to his country, and his innate manhood. Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best and it removes all that is base. Americans pride themselves on being He Men and they ARE He Men. Remember that the enemy is just as frightened as you are, and probably more so. They are not supermen. All through your Army careers, you men have bitched about what you call 'chicken shit drilling.' That, like everything else in this Army, has a definite purpose. That purpose is alertness. Alertness must be bred into every soldier. I don't give a fuck for a man who's not always on his toes. You men are veterans or you wouldn't be here. You are ready for what's to come. A man must be alert at all times if he expects to stay alive. If you're not alert, sometime, a German son-of-an-asshole-bitch is going to sneak up behind you and beat you to death with a sockful of shit! There are four hundred neatly marked graves somewhere in Sicily, all because one man went to sleep on the job. But they are German graves, because we caught the bastard asleep before they did. An Army is a team. It lives, sleeps, eats, and fights as a team. This individual heroic stuff is pure horse shit. The bilious bastards who write that kind of stuff for the Saturday Evening Post don't know any more about real fighting under fire than they know about f_-_-_-_-_-_-_! We have the finest food, the finest equipment, the best spirit, and the best men in the world. Why, by God, I actually pity those poor sons-of-bitches we're going up against. By God, I do. My men don't surrender. I don't want to hear of any soldier under my command being captured unless he has been hit. Even if you are hit, you can still fight back. That's not just bull shit either. The kind of man that I want in my command is just like the lieutenant in Libya, who, with a Luger against his chest, jerked off his helmet, swept the gun aside with one hand, and busted the hell out of the Kraut with his helmet. Then he jumped on the gun and went out and killed another German before they knew what the hell was coming off. And, all of that time, this man had a bullet through a lung. There was a real man! All of the real heroes are not storybook combat fighters, either. Every single man in this Army plays a vital role. Don't ever let up. Don't ever think that your job is unimportant. Every man has a job to do and he must do it. Every man is a vital link in the great chain. What if every truck driver suddenly decided that he didn't like the whine of those shells overhead, turned yellow, and jumped headlong into a ditch? The cowardly bastard could say, 'Hell, they won't miss me, just one man in thousands.' But, what if every man thought that way? Where in the hell would we be now? What would our country, our loved ones, our homes, even the world, be like? No, Goddamnit, Americans don't think like that. Every man does his job. Every man serves the whole. Every department, every unit, is important in the vast scheme of this war. The ordnance men are needed to supply the guns and machinery of war to keep us rolling. The Quartermaster is needed to bring up food and clothes because where we are going there isn't a hell of a lot to steal. Every last man on K.P. has a job to do, even the one who heats our water to keep us from getting the 'G.I. Shits.' Each man must not think only of himself, but also of his buddy fighting beside him. We don't want yellow cowards in this Army. They should be killed off like rats. If not, they will go home after this war and breed more cowards. The brave men will breed more brave men. Kill off the Goddamned cowards and we will have a nation of brave men. One of the bravest men that I ever saw was a fellow on top of a telegraph pole in the midst of a furious fire fight in Tunisia. I stopped and asked what the hell he was doing up there at a time like that. He answered, 'Fixing the wire, Sir'. I asked, 'Isn't that a little unhealthy right about now?' He answered, 'Yes Sir, but the Goddamned wire has to be fixed'. I asked, 'Don't those planes strafing the road bother you?' And he answered, 'No, Sir, but you sure as hell do!' Now, there was a real man. A real soldier. There was a man who devoted all he had to his duty, no matter how seemingly insignificant his duty might appear at the time, no matter how great the odds. And you should have seen those trucks on the rode to Tunisia. Those drivers were magnificent. All day and all night they rolled over those son-of-a-bitching roads, never stopping, never faltering from their course, with shells bursting all around them all of the time. We got through on good old American guts. Many of those men drove for over forty consecutive hours. These men weren't combat men, but they were soldiers with a job to do. They did it, and in one hell of a way they did it. They were part of a team. Without team effort, without them, the fight would have been lost. All of the links in the chain pulled together and the chain became unbreakable. Don't forget, you men don't know that I'm here. No mention of that fact is to be made in any letters. The world is not supposed to know what the hell happened to me. I'm not supposed to be commanding this Army. I'm not even supposed to be here in England. Let the first bastards to find out be the Goddamned Germans. Some day I want to see them raise up on their piss-soaked hind legs and howl, 'Jesus Christ, it's the Goddamned Third Army again and that son-of-a-fucking-bitch Patton.' We want to get the hell over there. The quicker we clean up this Goddamned mess, the quicker we can take a little jaunt against the purple pissing Japs and clean out their nest, too. Before the Goddamned Marines get all of the credit. Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-bitch Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake! When a man is lying in a shell hole, if he just stays there all day, a German will get to him eventually. The hell with that idea. The hell with taking it. My men don't dig foxholes. I don't want them to. Foxholes only slow up an offensive. Keep moving. And don't give the enemy time to dig one either. We'll win this war, but we'll win it only by fighting and by showing the Germans that we've got more guts than they have; or ever will have. We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-bitches, we're going to rip out their living Goddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun cocksuckers by the bushel-fucking-basket. War is a bloody, killing business. You've got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours. Rip them up the belly. Shoot them in the guts. When shells are hitting all around you and you wipe the dirt off your face and realize that instead of dirt it's the blood and guts of what once was your best friend beside you, you'll know what to do! I don't want to get any messages saying, 'I am holding my position.' We are not holding a Goddamned thing. Let the Germans do that. We are advancing constantly and we are not interested in holding onto anything, except the enemy's balls. We are going to twist his balls and kick the living shit out of him all of the time. Our basic plan of operation is to advance and to keep on advancing regardless of whether we have to go over, under, or through the enemy. We are going to go through him like crap through a goose; like shit through a tin horn! From time to time there will be some complaints that we are pushing our people too hard. I don't give a good Goddamn about such complaints. I believe in the old and sound rule that an ounce of sweat will save a gallon of blood. The harder WE push, the more Germans we will kill. The more Germans we kill, the fewer of our men will be killed. Pushing means fewer casualties. I want you all to remember that. There is one great thing that you men will all be able to say after this war is over and you are home once again. You may be thankful that twenty years from now when you are sitting by the fireplace with your grandson on your knee and he asks you what you did in the great World War II, you WON'T have to cough, shift him to the other knee and say, 'Well, your Granddaddy shoveled shit in Louisiana.' No, Sir, you can look him straight in the eye and say, 'Son, your Granddaddy rode with the Great Third Army and a Son-of-a-Goddamned-Bitch named Georgie Patton!' "
Thus was the courage and fighting spirit during World War II and why we were victorious.
Next comes Rush Limbaugh:
One of the darkest days in the history of the House of Representatives is slated for tomorrow. This is where they're going to vote on this nonbinding resolution, and the "slow bleed process to take the president out of Iraq. Actually, the process here is to isolate him politically and to limit his ability to maneuver, similar to what happened with the Democrats in the Congress during the Vietnam War with Nixon. They actually never did cut off funding for Nixon, but they did tell him where he couldn't send troops. It eventually led to a debacle, and the same thing is being planned here by people, and they're calling themselves "courageous;" people who are telling themselves and their audiences that they are acting in the best interests of the country. But I'll tell you, there is no sound bite; there is no torturously crafted statement; there is no skillful twist of logic; no lawyerly proclamation; no media spin, whatsoever, that will turn the House vote tomorrow -- this nonbinding resolution -- into anything but a disgrace of historic proportion. The only positive here in these debates, is that the House is showing they have the courage to show they have none. They are demonstrating, for each and every one of us, that they have all the courage in the world to show that they have no courage whatsoever. Do you know what courage would be here? Courage would be going against the polls and supporting the mission. Courage would be going with the polls and cutting off funds. Neither of these options are on the table for these people, because they don't have the courage to do either of those things. All they have is the courage to say, "We support the troops, Mr. Limbaugh! We support the troops," and that, my friends, is not support. It is the guidance of political consultants who tell 'em what to say. But what message are they sending to our troops? What message are they sending to the enemy, and what message are they sending to Pelosi's children and grandchildren? Speaker Pelosi, Congressmen Hoyer and Murtha, you might be conning the moderates out there. No doubt you are. But, you're not fooling the left -- your ragtag mob out there who want immediate withdrawal -- and you're not fooling the right who want victory. This historic BS, this historic Barbra Streisand will have little effect now, but it will put you in the record books for arranging one of the darkest days in the history of the House of Representatives.
Last, Congressman Ric Keller, a traitorous Republican from the state of Florida. This sniveling coward needs a hemp necktie for his next formal dinner engagement. Compare his stand to America's enemies to General Patton.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to discuss the War in Iraq. I oppose the surge. We don’t need more American troops caught in the cross hairs of a civil war. After nearly 4 years, it’s high time for the Iraqis to send in their own troops to take out the Shia militias and the Sunni insurgents.In short, the problem in Iraq is that we are losing nearly 100 American lives every month, and we are spending $2 billion a week. The solution is not to lose even more lives and to spend even more money. I approach this subject with a great deal of humility, and it is not my intention to micromanage this war. I am merely a Member of Congress, and not a 4 star general. But I have listened to what the most well-respected, 4 star generals in the United States have to say about this matter. And Generals Abizaid, Casey, and Colin Powell have all said that sending another surge of troops into Iraq is not the answer. I’m terribly concerned about interjecting American troops into the middle of civil war violence. Who do they shoot at? The Sunni? The Shia? Well, one thing we know is that 61% of Iraqis approve of violent attacks against our U.S. troops.Does that sound like a grateful country to you? Thanks to our brave American troops, Saddam Hussein and al-Zarqawi are dead. The Iraqi people have had 3 democratic elections. And three-fourths of the senior al-Qaeda operatives have been killed or captured. And yet 61% of Iraqis want to kill American troops? And 79% of Iraqis have a “mostly negative” view of the United States. The American people have paid the ultimate price for this war, and now is not the time to escalate the tragedy even further. This Iraq war has lasted longer than World War II, it has claimed more American lives than the attacks of 9/11, and it has cost more money than the Vietnam War.The military action this Congress authorized in 2002 was for a far different purpose than the war we face today. I voted to authorize the use of force because I did not want Saddam Hussein to give weapons of mass destruction to al-Qaeda. Now Saddam Hussein is dead, and there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Why did we stay in Iraq? Because we wanted the Iraqi people to have a unified and secure government, so that Iraq would not become a haven for terrorists, like what happened to Afghanistan after Russia pulled out.Unfortunately, the Iraqi government has provided neither unity nor security. After nearly 4 years, the Iraqis still have not achieved reconciliation, still not decided how to share their oil revenues, and still not dealt with the militias and insurgents.For example, 80% of the sectarian violence in Iraq is within a 30 mile radius of Bagdad. Yet, despite the fact that the Iraqi security forces outnumber the al-Sadr militia by a ratio of 5 to 1 (300,000 vs. 60,000), the Maliki government still has not taken action to take out Moqtada al-Sadr and his militia. In his speech, President Bush tells us that he emphasized the importance of benchmarks with Prime Minister Maliki. Unfortunately, the Iraqi government has a pattern of not fulfilling its promises with regard to benchmarks.For example, when I was in Iraq in May of last year, the Iraqi government officials told me they would be able to provide security for themselves by December of ’06. Now they’re saying they hope to have their own security in place by December of 2007.Similarly, the U.S. surged the number of troops in Baghdad last summer from 7,500 to 15,000 to take out insurgents, but the Iraqi government reneged on its promise to provide Iraqi troops and, as a result, the insurgents came right back after we left. Mr. Speaker, I believe the motives of President Bush, and other prominent leaders such as Senator John McCain who are pushing for more troops, are pure and well meaning. I believe they sincerely think this is the best way forward. Three years ago, I would have agreed with them. However, at this late stage, interjecting more young American troops into the cross fire of an Iraqi civil war is simply not the right approach. We’re not going to solve an Iraqi political problem with an American military solution. In closing, regardless of how one feels about the War in Iraq, or the proposed surge in troops, as long as our American troops are in harms way, it is our duty and responsibility to support these troops 100%.May God bless our troops and our country. I yield back the balance of my time.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 01:04 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 19, 2007

The Democrat's Ultimate Goal

When you appeal to force, there's one thing you must never do - lose.
Dwight D. Eisenhower

General Pertraeus has recently been endorsed by Congress to become the commander of American forces in Iraq, a job the Democrats endorsed for him with the words, "Godspeed, General." However, with their vote on Friday for a "non-binding" resolution condemning President Bush's troop surge, good Liberal Democrats again will have brain constipation and forget everything their traitorous party chiefs have said in the past. The vote for condemning the troop increase has, at least, set the Liberal agenda in Iraq. They have thrown their fortunes squarely behind an American defeat in Iraq. Historically, the Democrats have been on the wrong side of every war from Viet Nam, and several before that era. (Think Civil War.) Their cowardice and treachery have correctly given the Democrats a reputation for weakness, cowardice and pomposity in matters concerning national defense. They were the ones who incorrectly screamed that a nuclear freeze was the only path to peaceful coexistence with the Soviet Union and accused President Ronald Reagan of being a warmonger for his "peace through strength" approace every day of Reagan's presidency. The Democrats were the only prominent opponents of the 1991 Gulf War. If the Liberal Democrats had their way, Hussein would still be in Kuwait to this day, and we would be "negotiating" his withdrawal back inside Iraq's borders, leaving thousands of dead Kuwaitis behind. And, of couse, there is Clinton's foreign policy failures, everything from providing nuclear secrets to China to his failure to take bin Laden when he had the chance. All well documented historical facts. Given their sorry record to date, it's little wonder that Democrats need to claim success on a foreign affairs matter now. The only problem is, their political demands are in direct conflict with American national security interests, and to a Democrat, national security interests ALWAYS take back seat to Democrat political interests. Democrats have always thrown roadblocks in the way of American success in the war in Iraq. They have done more than support and promote measures that signal irresolution, weakness and division to America's enemies. Prominent Democrats such as Chucky Cheesy Schumer have openly declared the war in Iraq to be "unwinnable," even as terror operations in Baghdad have fallen by 80% since the Iraqi and U.S. forces have begun the new security plan, according to Iraqi army spokesman. John Murtha, that paragon of Democrat morality, is seeking to impose funding restrictions on the war, in an effort to insure defeat under the guise of "protecting the American fighting soldier." It is a treasonous and cowardly way to render U.S. success in Iraq impossible while sparing the Democrats the unpopular and openly transparent act of withholding funding for our troops in harm's way. Of course, no one knows if the increase in troop strength in Iraq will succeed---even though certain high-ranking al Quaida leaders aren't sticking around to find out---but one thing IS certain: if the Democrats have their way, the war WILL fail and the Isamofascist terrorist belief that the U.S. is too weak and decadent to defeat them will become anchored in fact. While it is becoming obvious to anyone with a living brain cell that the Democrats are inescapably aligned with America's enemies, the American people are right to be afraid of a political party that must hope for and work toward an American defeat to consolidate their power. I am afraid, however, that their treachery goes even deeper. I believe the Democrat party is solidly a Socialist party, and their final victory will be the overthrow of the American Constitutional way of government and the instigation of a true Socialist totalitarian form of government. I believe this to be their ultimate goal for each of us.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 01:41 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 16, 2007

Top 10 threats to our republic

10 reasons to keep and carry in condition 1

I wish I had a dollar for every time I think to myself how shocked my Great Grandparents would be, if they were alive today, by what our country has become. As a society, we’re pathetic and weak. We’ve grown fat and lazy and we’ve had it so good and so easy for so long that our society actually teaches its children to expect everything. The majority of American citizens have absolutely no idea how bad things could get, and they’re gleefully unaware of how bad things have gotten for American citizens in the past. Unlike today, citizens in the past were perfectly willing to lay their lives on the line to keep their shining city on a hill. Today I really doubt that would be the case.

Recently, I watched a documentary on the war in the Pacific during WWII called “Hell in the Pacific”. I believe it is still running on the History Channel and if you get a chance to see it, do so. I’ve watched it twice now. It is made up of actual film clips of the Pacific campaign along with interviews from survivors (both US and Japanese) and I believe there were some historians thrown in as well. It is a no holds barred ordeal with footage of US Soldiers and Marines in Okinawa littering piles of dead and wounded Japanese with bullets before their commanding officers arrived because, as they described it (I’m paraphrasing here), “we couldn’t carry anyone back”. There were clips of surviving Japanese civilians claiming that, if the US had invaded the island of Japan, that they were perfectly willing to fight to the end and die. There was footage of civilians throwing themselves off cliffs for fear that US troops would rape and ravage them. There was footage of an Air Force pilot (I’m sorry to say I can’t remember the gentleman’s name) who was on board the Enola Gay and said that he didn’t feel sorry for what he did. He said he was glad because the Japanese were the enemy and they had brought it upon themselves. There were Soldiers and Marines that said that they hated the Japanese because they were the ENEMY. They wanted them all dead because they were sick of the damn war and they wanted to finish the job. It described the war in the Pacific for what it was, “Hell”. I was struck by how lucky we were to have people willing to do what needed to be done. I doubt that we, as a society, would have the necessary resolve today.

I believe that there are a number of things that have been slowly eroding away our society’s resolve and our will to be good citizens willing to die for our country. There are a handful of issues that have turned a once fierce tiger into a fat, tame, soft house cat ripe for the taking.

10. Public Education
Our schools have become bastions of idealism. Gone are the days of teaching little Johnny and Judith the life skills necessary to make them a productive member of society. Today, the teacher’s union assures an environment of political indoctrination without the benefit of accountability. Our kids graduate without knowing how to read or do math but they know that it’s okay to have two mommies, they know how to put on a condom, and they know that evolution is science while creation is myth.

9. Failures of our Legal System
Number 9 on my list could have easily fallen a lot closer to number 1 but they all seem important and I couldn’t really decide. Judges and lawyers are rapidly becoming the silent ruling class. If issues can’t be shoved down our throats through legislation, they’re run through the courts. There’s also that little problem about doing the crime but having enough money to hire a legal team to assure that you won't do the time. Yeah, I’m pretty sure the founding fathers didn’t see that being a problem.

8. Taxation
How many times does socialism need to fail before it becomes blatantly obvious to everyone that it just doesn’t work. A minority of producers who break their backsides to help foot the bill for those who don’t want to produce will only tolerate so much. There’s this little thing called “human nature” that determines that, once you remove the reward, the monkeys just aren’t willing to do tricks. In this day and age, if the monkeys decide to stop doing tricks, the shelves at Best Buy go bare. So my advice to the IRS, stop taking away the monkey chow so we can all watch the Super Bowl in high definition. Besides, it sure would be nice to comply with my yearly raping before April 15 and go to bed secure in the knowledge that I’ve done everything correctly.

7. Drugs and alcohol
I know I may get some heat for including this one on the list. The fact remains, our society drinks. A lot. In my opinion, it contributes to our complacency and it makes us soft, clueless, and pliable for a government all too anxious to “get some” from a populace too sloppy drunk to say no.

6. Illegal Immigration
This issue is really a product of number 1 but I thought it deserved its own place on the list. We cannot have a country without citizens and granting all of the benefits of being a citizen to illegals makes citizenship irrelevant. Send them home. No social security, no credit cards, no medical care, no lawsuits. You enter through the front door only please. You knock, you wipe your feet off on the mat, and you treat our property with the respect it has earned and deserves. Otherwise, you’re somebody else’s problem, not ours. Our jails, public schools, and places of employment are for Americans only.

5. Political Correctness
This disease has found itself climbing all the way up to number 5 on our list. Political correctness is the silent killer in our society. It is the favorite of news anchors, soccer moms, lawyers, and politicians. It is the tool that allows people to stand on their head and tell the rest of the world that they are upside down. Political correctness invades our schools, our prisons, and most disturbingly our wars. The friends of my enemy are my enemy also. Political correctness is a means to say that it is okay to be in bed with the enemy. Political correctness is being forced to lie for fear that the truth will upset someone. Political correctness is slow suicide.

4. Government Dependency
It’s been a slow, spiraling, downhill trek. I’d say that many among us never saw it coming but self accountability is an outdated term. No longer are you expected to take care of your own needs. In some cases, it is hard to tell where the needs and the wants differ and it matters little because you’re not responsible for the wants either. Pitting classes and races against one another has become a staple of the politician (again see number 1). Nobody wants the burden of self accountability and very few enjoy the benefits of self respect. Everything is a right. We have the right to this and the right to that. What happened to The Bill of Rights? Isn’t that supposed to be all we need? How about Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness? Heck no, all we need to do is hold our hand out. The government will reach into its endless coffers and give it to us if we lack the brains, brawn, or fortitude to earn it for ourselves. Disgusting…

3. Racial Issues
In this day and age, this issue is largely created by the politicians (once again see number 1). We see racial issues in everything in our society because the perceived problem allows someone to come in and create a program or a policy to help fight it. Notice I didn’t say help fix it because programs and policies never fix anything. Fixing the problem would mean an end to a program or policy and I don’t know that that has ever occurred. We need exceptions, special considerations, and exclusive holidays, contests, scholarships, and programs for those who qualify under a special racial group. We used to be Americans, now we’re African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans. Hell, we’re even creating racial divides where race isn’t a part of the equation, i.e. Gay Americans. Pretending to remove racial differences would be pretending to remove culture. People will always adhere to culture. You cannot remove racial differences and we don’t need hero politicians to force people to pretend to accept other people that are different. You either like, accept, socialize with, hire, etc. people that are different than you or you don’t. You can’t legislate race acceptance without being racist.

2. Media
Well, the media has made it all the way up to the number 2 reason why we should all be carrying cocked and locked. There is the obvious liberal biased of the mainstream news media. That is, of course damaging to our free society and political arena of ideas. However, I think the overall concept of media, as in television, internet, radio etc. needs to be examined and blamed for a great deal of our societal ills, not just political ills. Our media places attention on so many things that are not, or should not be noteworthy. We’ve spent over a week now breathlessly examining all of the legal angles, paternity issues, sexual preferences, and questionable lifestyle practices of a whore (that would be Anna Nicole Smith) who somehow found herself a media sweetheart. This constant demand for news stories has created a media culture perfectly willing to go to any lengths to make something newsworthy. We place such an importance on people that are on television. Our athletes are criminals, our movie stars are ranting narcissists, and our musicians are looked to for political advice. The local weather man is a celebrity while the local soldier killed in combat is mentioned and then largely forgotten. We should be ASHAMED of what our society considers important. Our media has created a world that spoon feeds a daily dose of complete nonsense to a populace completely incapable of independent analysis.

1. No Leadership
At number 1, we have the leadership issue. That would be the lack of leadership from ANY of our elected officials. Elected officials have ceased being public servants. The welfare of the public is secondary to the career of the politician. The goal is to get elected, dote on the groups that helped get you elected, create as many groups (and their associated “problems”) as possible to help get you elected in the future, and somewhere down the line comes the public that actually voted you into office. The gap between the average citizen and the elected politician has become a gaping chasm. We allow our Congressman and Senators to vote in their own pay raises, and then get in bed with as many special interest groups as possible to keep them firmly entrenched in public life. They are held to a completely different set of standards when it comes to criminal behavior, drug and alcohol abuse, deviant sexual behavior, and personal financial dealings. They are far above the common man, as they live a lifestyle that is unknown to anyone outside their enclave of political bureaucracy.

Our society is made up of the enemies within, the fat and ignorant sheep that are fast asleep on America’s pile of wealth, and the rest of us painfully aware and ready for the whole freaking house to go up in flames at any moment. There are so many that are gleefully unaware of an enemy out there that is perfectly willing, like the Japanese during WWII, to fight to the very last man if necessary to eliminate our way of life. We’re taught in school that we cannot hate, we’re afraid to say anything because we might get sued, we’re too busy working to pay our taxes, we’re too drunk or stoned to notice, we’re too busy paying for health insurance for illegals, we think that hating the enemy wouldn’t be politically correct, we depend on the government to solve the problem for us, we think that hating the enemy would be racist, the media tells us we have no enemy, and our bloody politicians are too busy with their "careers" to do their jobs.

My great grandparents were true patriots, proud patriotic Americans. Actually, they lost their oldest son to the Japanese in WWII. They would be shocked at what we’ve become. Shocked and ashamed.

Keep the gun slits free of obstructions, stay healthy of body and mind, keep the family and loved ones close within the circle, and keep the firearms handy - condition 1 - cocked and locked baby. When it happens, I’m keeping this hill, and I’m not carrying anyone back.

Posted by RobF at 05:50 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Liberal Emotion Vs. Conservative Logic

Nations, like individuals, are punished for their transgressions.
Ulysses S. Grant

Let's face the truth. It's a lot harder to be a Conservative than a Liberal. It requires more integrity, character, courage and strength. The reason is obvious, if you think about it with a clear head, something Liberals seem unable to do. Liberalism, at it's basic elements, is really nothing more than a childish emotionalism that is applied to adult issues. To the Liberal's mind, war is mean, so we can't go to war. That person is poor, so we need to give him money. That girl can't raise a child, so let her have an abortion. Those boys are gay, so who are we to say they can't be married? I'm special, because I want to stop global warming. If we're extra nice to those terrorists, they'll like us, and won't want to kill us. Liberals are nice people who love everybody, and want to make everybody happy and feel goooooooooooood. But Conservatives? Why, they're bigots, racists, homophobes, Nazis, fascists, nasty, evil, wicked, stupid and knuckledraggers. (I have actually been called that on a Liberal blog!) Listen, when you are trying to deal with complex, adult situations, emotionalism that is designed to make you "feel good" leads to disaster instead of solving real, adult problems. Liberals never learn from their past mistakes. They just keep repeating the same mistake over and over again. That's why we throw trillions of dollars at education or poverty or ghettoes, and these problems never improve. Liberals think we need to throw more. These same principles apply to America's ability to wage war. I served in Viet Nam, and I know from first hand experience what I'm talking about. South Vietnam was policing its own country and holding off aggression from the North with the help of the United States. But, people get hurt in wars, so wars are bad. As a result of thinking that went no deeper than that, liberals in Congress cut off the aid and air support we promised the South Vietnamese. Every night, Americans turned on their TV sets, not to the atrocities committed by North Viet Nam, but body counts of American dead. The results of Liberal feelgoodism in Viet Nam? The conquest of South Vietnam, a holocaust in Cambodia, millions dead and in prison camps, another million boat people, a crisis of confidence in America, and our country's reputation around the world was left in tatters, which led to a revolution in Nicaragua, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and a lack of faith in the U.S. military which wasn't truly restored until Operation Desert Storm. So, we're talking about one of the most shameful and damaging mistakes in American history. Yet, the left is pushing to do the same thing in Iraq, despite the fact that catastrophic consequences would surely also follow a U.S. retreat in that country. But Liberals aren't happy with interferring in just anti-war crap. Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty" resulted in spending trillions, that's T-r-i-l-l-i-o-n-s, on poverty, but did nothing to reduce the poverty rate. What it DID do was to help drive the illegitimacy rate among black Americans from 22% in 1960 to 70% in 2005. Liberalism ALWAYS generates the exact opposite of it's stated intent. There is no shortage of such examples.Rent control? Resulted in housing shortages. Minimum wage? Cost poor people employment opportunity. That's what happens when you put feeling good over doing what is right. Unlike Liberals, Conservatives are realists. They concern themselves with looking at the way things are, not what we would like them to be. That's why Conservatives respect traditions and institutions such as marriage and limited government. Conservatives respect and approve of things that have proven to work over a long period of time, and see no reason to change. If it's not broke, don't fix it. Conservatives are not against change, because progress revolves around change, but the concept of tinkering with proven concepts creates a more likely chance that they will quit working. Conservatives regularly do something that liberals seldom do: they consider the long-term consequences of their policies. Sometimes in politics, that's a tough duty. It's always easier to say, "We're going to use someone else's tax money to give you this right now," than it is to say, "We're going to keep government out of your way and let you do this for yourself." But, that's the path conservatives have chosen for themselves. They’re willing to be attacked and called, in some form or fashion, "mean" in order to advocate policies that are good for the country. In the end, that's what liberalism versus conservatism all comes down to: sappy, feel good emotionalism that sounds appealing, but doesn't work versus doing things the right way, even when it's not easy.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 03:21 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 13, 2007

"I'm Joe Kennedy, And Help Is On The Way!"

Lack of discipline has destroyed many people before now.
Xenophon

Relations between Venezuela and the United States has rapidly deteriorated recently, with the strongarm dictator Hugo Chavez going so far as to call our President "the devil." But all that is irrelevant to Joe Kennedy. Advertisements presently airing shows Joe standing on an oil rig in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela, saying, "Heating oil at 40 percent off from our friends at Venezuela and CITGO. Call me at Citizens Energy. No one should be left out in the cold." Here we have proof positive that Liberals consider Socialist dictators their friends. Fortunately, Representative Connie Mack (R-FL), calling Chavez "the most dangerous man in the Western Hemisphere," wrote a scathing letter to Joey. "Chavez is a sworn enemy of the United States. there is absolutely no excuse for you to be praising him in television commercials and media interviews for any reason whatsoever. More than 40 years ago, your uncle - President John F. Kennedy - spoke about the perils of communism in the Western Hemisphere and the threats posed by Fidel Castro, saying: 'We and our Latin friends will have to face the fact that we cannot postpone any longer the real issue of survival of freedom in this hemisphere itself,' " Mack noted. "Those words still ring true today," he added. Stephanie DuBois, a spokesperson for Mack, said the letter was sparked by the fact that CITGO, a Houston-based oil company owned by the Venezuelan government, is providing heating oil at a 40 percent discount to Citizens Energy Corporation, which Kennedy founded in 1979 and heads as chairman and president. "No one should be left out in the cold," Kennedy concludes the ad. Kennedy responded with a letter of his own late Monday. "I appreciate your interest, however misguided your conclusions may be, regarding our efforts to provide low-cost heating oil to thousands of low-income people, whose federal fuel benefits, by the way, you voted to cut by over $1 billion just a few months ago. If, in fact, your objection to our program is the politics of President Chavez and the actions that he's taken - which you feel threaten our democracy - I would suggest you hold all 558 million barrels of oil we import annually from Venezuela to the same moral standard and not just the small slice we provide at a discount to the poor." I would like to remind the benevolent Mr. Kennedy that he and his party has voted repeatedly against drilling for oil here in our own country. Could his dealings with Citizen's Energy Corporation have any bearing on his past voting record? Are any other Democrat leaders involved with this corporation? We will do some digging...stay tuned...Just what is Kennedy's relationship to Chavez, and did they sign a contract requiring Kennedy to say and do certain things in his commercials to get the heating oil? Just how many Democrats are there that are making money off their refusal to allow us to drill for our own oil, anyway? Treasonous rats.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 12:46 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 12, 2007

The Real Inconvenient Truth That Gore Doesn't Want You To Know

Remember upon the conduct of each depends the fate of all.
Alexander the Great

The United Nations has issued a report recently that states global warming is man-made and we humans are responsible for soon reducing the earth to a charred cinder. But Marc Morano, communications director with the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, claims the "scientific" report is a lie. During his appearance on Fox News, Morano said, The first thing you have to realize is that what the U.N. came out with is not a scientific document, it is a political document approved by U.N. political delegates. The media has been reporting around the world that thousands of scientists have gotten together and this is their report. That is not the case. This is not thousands of scientists speaking, this is hundreds of U.N. bureaucrats and delegates speaking. The New York Times last year in April said that "few scientists agree that any recent weather events including Katrina, drought or floods are due to man-made global warming. There's nothing they can point to that's outside natural variability.” When Gibson brought up the threat from Jacques Chirac of France that the European Union would heavily tax American exports to Europe if the U.S. doesn’t fall into line with the Kyoto Protocol – which dictates limits on the emission of greenhouse gases – Morano responded. “It's the same Jacques Chirac who called Kyoto the first step to authentic global governance in 2000. That gives you an idea of the agenda behind it and Jacques Chirac is threatening the U.S. The odd thing about it is, 13 of the 15 EU nations aren't meeting the requirements of Kyoto and the EU nations’ emissions are rising twice as fast as the U.S. The U.S. is actually doing better even though we haven't ratified Kyoto. But they're trying to make the U.S. out to be the evil boogieman in the world.” Meanwhile, one leading scientist is placing the blame for global warming on another “culprit” – the sun. Israeli astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, who has made a name for himself studying meteorites, said, “Solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th-century global warming.” In remarks reported by Canada’s National Post, Dr. Shaviv stated that much evidence has been accumulating over the past decade of the strong relationship that variations in the sun’s cosmic-ray emissions have on our atmosphere – so much evidence that “it is unlikely that [the solar-climate link] does not exist.” In his study of meteorites, published in the prestigious journal Physical Review Letters, Dr. Shaviv found that some meteorites reaching the earth sustained up to 10 percent more cosmic-ray damage than others. That kind of cosmic-ray variation, he believes, could alter global temperatures by as much as 15 percent – enough to begin or end an ice age. In other news, The Weather Channel’s Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program "The Climate Code," is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their "Seal of Approval" for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe. "If a meteorologist can't speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn't give them a Seal of Approval. Clearly, the AMS doesn't agree that global warming can be blamed on cyclical weather patterns," Cullen wrote in her December 21 weblog on the Weather Channel Website. Cullen’s call for decertification of TV weathermen who do not agree with her global warming assessment follows a year (2006) in which the media, Hollywood and environmentalists tried their hardest to demonize scientific skeptics of manmade global warming. Scott Pelley, CBS News 60 Minutes correspondent, compared skeptics of global warming to "Holocaust deniers" and former Vice President turned foreign lobbyist Al Gore has repeatedly referred to skeptics as "global warming deniers." TV weathermen skeptical of climate alarmism have -- up until now -- been unburdened to speak out on climate issues. Cullen’s call for decertification by the AMS can only serve to intimidate skeptics and further chill free speech in the scientific community. Stripping the "Seal of Approval" from broadcast meteorologists could affect their livelihoods, impact their salaries and prestige. TV weathermen are truly the last of the independent scientists and past surveys have shown many of them to be skeptical of manmade global warming claims. Their independence is being threatened now. Intimidating scientists with calls for death trials, name calling and calls for decertification appears to be the accepted tactics of the climate alarmists. The real question is: Why do climate alarmists feel the need to resort to such low brow tactics when they have a compliant media willing to repeat their every assertion without question? MONEY. Just how much money do the climate alarmists have at their disposal? There was a $3 billion donation to the global warming cause from Virgin Air’s Richard Branson alone. The well-heeled environmental lobbying groups have massive operating budgets compared to groups that express global warming skepticism. The Sierra Club Foundation 2004 budget was $91 million and the Natural Resources Defense Council had a $57 million budget for the same year. Compare that to the often media derided Competitive Enterprise Institute’s small $3.6 million annual budget. In addition, if a climate skeptic receives any money from industry, the media immediately labels them and attempts to discredit their work. The same media completely ignore the money flow from the environmental lobby to climate alarmists like James Hansen and Michael Oppenheimer. (ie. Hansen received $250,000 from the Heinz Foundation and Oppenheimer is a paid partisan of Environmental Defense Fund) The alarmists have all of these advantages, yet they still feel the need to resort to desperation tactics to silence the skeptics. Could it be that the alarmists realize that the American public is increasingly rejecting their proposition that the family SUV is destroying the earth and rejecting their shrill calls for "action" to combat their computer model predictions of a "climate emergency?" That may be the real Inconvenient Truth. After all, even the UN is reportedly downgrading man’s impact on the climate by 25% and now concedes that cow "emissions" are more damaging to the planet than C02 from cars. Let's face the truth. The idea that global warming is destroying the earth has about as much basis in fact as the Dixie Chicks earning numerous awards.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 12:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 11, 2007

History Is Repeatable

The outcome of the war is in our hands; the outcome of words is in the council.
Homer

Tehran, Iran, Apr. 14 2006 President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:
“The Zionist regime is a dried up and rotten tree which will be annihilated with one storm”, Ahmadinejad said at a conference in Tehran dubbed “International Conference of Holy Qods and Support for the Rights of the Palestinian Nation”. The radical president who in December called for Israel to be “wiped off the map” said on Friday that the Jewish state was “heading towards annihilation”.

Februarry 11, 2007, Iran:
Ali Larijani, speaking at a forum that gathered the world's top security officials, said Iran doesn't have aggressive intentions toward any nation. "That Iran is willing to threaten Israel is wrong," Larijani said. "We pose no threat and if we are conducting nuclear research and development we are no threat to Israel. We have no intention of aggression against any country."

Neville Chamberlain, 1939:
"However much we may sympathize with a small nation confronted by a big and powerful neighbor, we cannot in all circumstances undertake to involve the whole British Empire in war simply on her account. If we have to fight it must be on larger issues than that. I am myself a man of peace to the depths of my soul. Armed conflict between nations is a nightmare to me; but if I were convinced that any nation had made up its mind to dominate the world by fear of its force, I should feel that it must be resisted. Under such a domination life for people who believe in liberty would not be worth living; but war is a fearful thing, and we must be very clear, before we embark upon it, that it is really the great issues that are at stake, and that the call to risk everything in their defense, when all the consequences are weighed, is irresistible. For the present I ask you to await as calmly as you can the events of the next few days. As long as war has not begun, there is always hope that it may be prevented, and you know that I am going to work for peace to the last moment. Good night."
Source: Neville Chamberlain, In Search of Peace (1939), p. 393

Chamberlain holds the paper containing the resolution to commit to peaceful methods signed by both Hitler and himself on his return from Germany at Croydon Airport in September 1938. He said:
My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honour. I believe it is peace for our time.

September 3, 1939.
In Chamberlain's radio broadcast to the nation, he noted:
This morning the British Ambassador in Berlin handed the German Government a final note stating that, unless we hear from them by 11 o'clock that they were prepared at once to withdraw their troops from Poland, a state of war would exist between us. I have to tell you now that no such undertaking has been received, and that consequently this country is at war with Germany.
You can imagine what a bitter blow it is to me that all my long struggle to win peace has failed. Yet I cannot believe that there is anything more, or anything different, that I could have done, and that would have been more successful... We have a clear conscience, we have done all that any country could do to establish peace, but a situation in which no word given by Germany's ruler could be trusted, and no people or country could feel themselves safe, had become intolerable... Now may God bless you all and may he defend the right. For it is evil things that we shall be fighting against, brute force, bad faith, injustice, oppression, and persecution. And against them I am certain that the right will prevail.

Following the debacle of the British expedition to Norway, Chamberlain found himself under siege in the House of Commons. During the Norway Debate of May 7, Leo Amery–who had been one of Chamberlain's personal friends–delivered a devastating indictment of Chamberlain's conduct of the war. In concluding his speech, he quoted the words of Oliver Cromwell to the Long Parliament:
"You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go".

Sir Winston Churchill, Radio speech, 1941
Here is the answer which I will give to President Roosevelt... We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire. Neither the sudden shock of battle nor the long-drawn trials of vigilance and exertion will wear us down. Give us the tools and we will finish the job.

Hillary Clinton reminiscing about the warm welcome New Hampshire voters had given the Clintons in 1992:
"The only thing I will try to do differently from my husband is not to make so many Dunkin' Donuts stops."

Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 08:27 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 07, 2007

Another Global Warming Lie Exposed

Timidi mater non flet
A coward's mother does not weep
Latin proverb

Let's see if something once known as "common sense" still holds water. It seems that Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva blamed wealthy countries for global warming on Tuesday and said they should stop telling Brazil what to do with the Amazon rainforest. "The wealthy countries are very smart, approving protocols, holding big speeches on the need to avoid deforestation but they already deforested everything," Lula said during the announcement of a public works project in Rio de Janeiro. Lula, a former factory worker, said wealthy countries should switch to non-fossil fuels, such as ethanol or biodiesel -- an area where Brazil is a pioneer. "We need a different campaign, not only to protect plants and animals ... to get rich countries to reduce gas emissions," he said. Brazil is the world's largest producer of ethanol, which is derived from sugar cane. It will invest 17.4 billion reais ($8.3 billion) in renewable fuels over the next four years. Accelerating demand for fuel ethanol has encouraged investors to move into traditional coffee growing areas in Minas Gerais state in search of more land to plant sugar cane. OK, here's where the common sense comes to play. I used to live in Florida, and a huge portion of the southern tip of Florida consists of sugar cane farms. These farms occupy thousands and thousands of acres of land near the Everglades. Every year, following the harvest, all these acres of land are burned off. The skies turn black, and the smoke is truly thick and nauseous. It takes days and days to burn the old crop away to make the land ready for the new plants. Common sense tells me, how come no one talks about the effect all this smoke has on global warming? What is the net gain of burning sugar cane over internal engines burning gasoline? How many people realize that the sugar has to be burned off every year, and is it taken for granted that what they don't know doesn't hurt them? This is the same kind of absurdity that Al Gore immerses himself in concerning global warming. He has no problem telling you to stop burning fossil fuels but he doesn't mind flying all over the world in private jet aircraft instead of taking commercial flights. Typical Liberal lies and hipocrisy. Do as they say, not as they do.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 10:26 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 06, 2007

Hillary Clinton's Campain Is In Trouble

When one side goes against the enemy with the gods' gift of stronger morale, then their adversaries, as a rule, cannot withstand them.
Xenophon

Several Clinton administration officials have decided to jump ship and abandon ol' Hillary in mid stream. They have decided to back her rivals for the Democrat nomination in 2008. Among the highest-ranking defectors can be found former Commerce Secretary William Daley who is backing Bobblehead Obama; clinton political aide Douglas Sosnik, who is advising Senator Christopher Dodd; and Chief of Staff to Al Gore Ronald Klain, rooting for Joe Biden. So reports the New York Sun. The list goes on...Former White House consel Abner Mikva, quoted as saying, “I knew Obama before I went to the White House,” Mikva told the Sun. “I have a high regard for Hillary. I think Barack will be a better candidate and has a better chance of winning.” It is rumored that Hillary is trying to get Mr. Mikva to take a ride with Senator Kennedy the next time he drives in Chappiquiddic. Other former Clinton officials in Obama's camp include Michael Froman, a Treasury official, White House congressional liaison Broderick Johnson, former Treasury aide Karen Kornbluh, ex-White House health policy aide Devorah Adler, former national security adviser to Bill Clinton, Anthony Lake, and Susan Rice, a former White House advisor on African policy. Clinton speechwriter Jonathan Prince, spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri and National Security Council staffer Miles Lackey has joined John Edwards' campaign. Others have hooked up with Tom Vilsack. Hillary spokesman Howard Wolfson told the Sun, "We are very pleased with the overwhelming support and encouragement Sen. Clinton has gotten from administration alums.” He omitted the fact that they were sorry Vince Foster wasn't still around to help out. These people probably remember how working for Hillary worked out for him! “All good folks and we wish them well," Wolfson said. I'd like to know what he REALLY wanted to say to them! In other news, Pigface Pelosi wants a really BIG airplane to match her really BIG ego. Reminds me of that old song, "What ever you can do, I can do better!" I'm pretty much over the disappointment of the election. I've decided to sit back and enjoy the dung fling in Washington. Harry Reid's hipocrisy knows no bounds. He has the audacity to question Republican stonewalling debate on Iraq, when the Democrats did everything in their power to stonewall nominations to the Supreme Court. As usual, if you are a Democrat, things are Different. God, I hate those people. America, you asked for it, now you're gonna get it.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 02:43 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

February 02, 2007

Swift-Boating the Queen of Lies, Hillary Clinton

War gives the right of the conquerors to impose any conditions they please upon the vanquished
Julius Caesar

Former Clinton aide Dick Morris, a man who has reformed from his past, is bringing out a documentary in September designed to expose Hillary for the phony she really is. The documentary will also depict Bill Clinton's involvement in matters ranging from his pardons to his work in Dubai. Liberals are expected to scream bloody murder over such outrageous antics performed by a Conservative, but let them scream. This documentary will be truthful, the same as that from Hanoiboy Kerry's detractors, the "Swiftboaters," not like the tripe and lies put out by that pile of human waste stuck under a baseball cap, Michael Moore. I'm sure the Liberals won't like a taste of their own medicine. "You have to get to the fundamental fact of her phoniness, her lack of credibility." Morris said. "That she is pretending to be something she is not. I think you can best explain that by showing her being contradictory. With Hillary, scandals are a gift that keep on giving." As an example of Hillary's disingenuousness, Morris will feature Hillary's NBC interview with Jane Pauley on Sept. 17, 2001. Trying to engender sympathy, Hillary told Pauley that when the two airplanes hit the World Trade Center, her daughter Chelsea was at Battery Park near the towers. "She'd gone for what she thought would be a great jog," Hillary said. "She was going down to Battery Park, she was going to go around the towers. She went to get a cup of coffee — and that's when the plane hit." "She was close enough to hear the rumble," Pauley said. "She did hear it. She did," Hillary said. "And to see the smoke . . ." "That's right," Hillary responded, saying she did not locate her daughter until two hours later. "At that moment, she was not just a senator, but a concerned parent," Katie Couric said the next day on NBC's "Today." It was a great tale, but Hillary had made it up from whole cloth. Her arrogance was so profound that she did not coordinate the story with Chelsea, who wrote an article for "Talk" in which she described what she had been doing that day. According to Chelsea, she wasn't jogging at the World Trade Center. Rather, she was miles away in a friend's apartment on Park Avenue South. She watched the events unfold on TV. Hillary told the story with a straight face. We need to remember that this woman is a true Socialist in the purest form of the word. She stands for everything a true American detests, and she needs to be defeated completely and forever. Our very survival may well depend on it.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 02:45 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 31, 2007

Arlen Specter, RINO

To brave men, the prizes that war offers are liberty and fame
Lycurgus of Sparta

The esteemed Republican Senator, Arlen "The Rino" Specter, made the news yesterday by informing President Bush that he is not the only decision maker in Iraq. Today, our enemies in the Arab world have been encouraged, again, by the stupid antics of our stupid leadership in Washington to renew their war efforts against the United States. When are the fools, both Republican and Democrat, in Washington going to wake up to the fact that their actions have a direct bearing on our survival, both individually and as a nation? With Democrats acting as traitors, and Republicans acting as spineless jellyfish, we're really in deep trouble. John "Hanoiboy" Kerry goes overseas and gives aid and comfort to our enemies, something he's been doing for most of his life, and Specter opens his stupid yap here in America and accomplishes the same exact thing. If we have any REAL leaders in Washington left, they better start realizing that they are all that's left to ensure there is an America in the future that is at least a little like the America our Founding Fathers gave us. The Senators in ancient Rome had the courage to actually stick a knife in their antagonists. Today, we're "civilized" and past that stage. At least the Romans were honest in their dealings with each other. Today, we've replaced the assassin's blade with character assassination using voice recording and video recording. How foul. Our own quest for power and fame is going to end up killing us all, and the people who were elected to protect us are the ones who will get us killed.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 11:25 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 30, 2007

The Democrat Party IS the Party of Traitors

Whoever wants to keep alive must aim at victory. It is the winners who do the killing and the losers who get killed.
Xenophon

Well, people, the Democrats are back in power, at least they think they are, and supposedly well on their way to rectify the Culture of Corruption through Democrat's brand of "ethics reform." Claiming credit is the new mustang from the Far Left, Barack "Bobblehead" Obama (D-IL). "Now that the dust has settled and the new Congress is underway," he stated, "we need to get down to business and show Americans that we are responding to their call for change. We now have the opportunity to give the American people what they deserve and demanded in November--real ethics and lobbying reform that holds their elected officials to the highest ethical standards." Stirring words, I must say. But last week Obama endorsed Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley for re-election this spring, even though his administration is filled with corruption and corrupted men. And then there's that paragon of moral strength, Harry Ratface Reid. This paragon of human dignity is again facing the embarrassment of a shady land deal. It's obvious why he represents such a large state as Nevada. New Jersey is much too small for his land grabbing plans. You've got to hand it to Reid. With a record like his, to claim that he is the champion of a new day of congressional ethics takes a lot of brass. He could prove it by resigning. Or Democrats could prove it by giving him the heave-ho as majority leader. But we know that will never happen. Reid is a Democrat, and things are DIFFERENT if you're a Democrat. And then there's ol' Hillary. You know Hillary...that pillar of womanhood with the two-timing spouse more famous than Mr. Limbaugh when it comes to fine cigars. Well, it seems that during her recent visit to Iowa she spoke out in favor of increasing American production of ethanol to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. At the State Capital of Des Moines, she said, "I believe we’ve got to take a strong stand on limiting our dependence on foreign oil. And we have a perfect example here in Iowa about how it can work with all of the ethanol that’s being produced here.” According to an article in the Chicago Tribune cited in a release from the Republican National Committee, Clinton "took questions and spoke of boosting production of ethanol.” But as a Senator from New York, Clinton has voted at least 17 times against measures promoting ethanol production, the RNC noted. During a question-and-answer session in 2004, Clinton was asked about "her outspoken opposition to legislation that would double the use of ethanol as a gasoline additive,” the Des Moines Register reported at the time. "She was momentarily stumped by a question as to why she opposed the ethanol mandate, but then said she was concerned that it would raise gasoline prices for her constituents.” Clinton reportedly said: "I have to look to first protecting and supporting the needs of the people I represent right now.” In 2002, Clinton even signed a letter that read in part: "There is no sound public policy reason for mandating the use of ethanol.” Typical for both a Clinton and a Democrat, just stick the "Public Opinion Indicator" up and see what direction the political winds are blowing. Democrats can be identified by their wind-burned index finger. Meanwhile, Senator John "Hanoiboy" Kerry is back overseas doing what comes naturally for the bum...badmouthing his own country and calling America a pariah to our enemies. Ya know, he took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Gee, he fits both categories. Someone needs to fit him for a hemp necktie. He should have assumed room temperature about 40 years ago when his traitorous behavior began. And guess who has forgotten all about her apology about her behavior when Hanoiboy was just an amateur traitor? Yep, Hanoi Jane is back! She claims the Radical Right (THAT'S ME!!!!!) lied about her years ago, but she just HAS to come out of retirement to speak out against the war. I told you, it's time for bell-bottoms and flowers in your hair again! The old hag doesn't know she lost all relevance years ago. And speaking about retirement, the nag Barbaro has been put to death, and the Left is in tears over the death of a stupid horse. This is a perfect example of their crazy ideas. They didn't raise an eyebrow over the murder of Terry Schievo, or not a peep over killing millions of unborn babies, but a HORSE? Crazed lunatics, there's no other description for such idiocy. Get your guns cleaned and oiled. I believe we're going to be needing them sometime soon.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 02:40 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 26, 2007

President Bush to Democrats-"I'm the Decision Maker!"

A bad peace is even worse than war.
Tacitus
My Man finally grew some backbone today. "I've picked the plan that I think is most likely to succeed," he said in an Oval Office meeting with senior military advisors. He also had strong words for both Republicans and Democrats who are preparing to oppose his decision to send additional troops to Iraq. "I know there is skepticism and pessimism and that some are condemning a plan before it's even had a chance to work," the president said. "They have an obligation and a serious responsibility therefore to put up their own plan as to what would work." We all know what he meant by that. Democrats have no plan. Never did, never will. All they can do is whine and whimper. The President met with Lt. General Petraeus, the new commander of U.S. troops in Iraq. The General should be commended for his outstanding ability to withstand sheer stupidity when, earlier in the day, the Senators who will vote to on a non-binding symbolic resolution condemning the Iraq war hipocritically wished the General "Godspeed" as he prepares to engage in the war to protect us. It never fails to amaze me how a slimey, gooey Democrat can manage to speak out of both sides of their mouth at the same time, and how stupid, crass brainless Liberals in the country are so blind by their crazed ideals not to see it. "As the president I must make sure he has everything he needs, that he thinks he needs, to succeed in the mission that we have sent him on," the president said. "I look forward to working with you to make sure that our generals and our troops that we put into harm's way have the support of the United States Congress." I'm sure he knows that is not going to happen. He is actually naming the Congress so that when they fail to support the troops, he can point to this statement. Americans need to realize that there is just one Commander-in-Chief, and it ain't Ted Kennedy, Pigface Pelosi or Ratface Reid. It's President Bush. President Bush will also have to make all the decisions concerning Iran. If Democrats really, REALLY want to help him in these difficult times, maybe they could consider putting the back-stabbing knives away, and trying something almost unknown to Liberals...saying a prayer for their President.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 04:16 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 25, 2007

Oh, No, The Time's Not Right For Senator John Kerry!

A dead enemy always smells good.
Alus Vitellus

What ever will we do? John "Hanoiboy" Kerry has decided the time isn't right for him to run for President again. Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) amazingly shows us his vast stupidity with the following statement:
“My initial reaction to Senator Kerry’s decision is one of extreme sadness. John Kerry is a major voice in American politics and the country would be much better off today if he were President. It is great news that John will be seeking re-election and I know his influence will continue to grow in the Senate and in America.”
This statement not only shows Biden's lack of intelligence, but also proves that Democrats have no sense of patriotism and morality. The "major voice" he speaks about was a voice of treason, cowardice and lies, all traits common to 99% of all Democrats. Pollster Mark Schulman has been quoted as saying, "He can read numbers as well as anybody else and as far as votes are concerned, he has barely made a ripple in the campaign." Mr. Schulman said the problem is exacerbated by the fact that voters know Mr. Kerry and simply don't like him. Finally, someone who has a clue. What he failed to mention is, once someone knows ANY Democrat, they won't like him or her. Democrats are stuck in a set mentality and are incapable of moving into the present. Did you hear Webb's rebuttal to President Bush's State of the Union Address? In lockstep, the Liberal mantra was repeated...President Bush led us into war recklessly. (SHHHHHH, keep it to yourself that this could also apply to all the slimey Democrats who also voted to go to war...) A month or two ago, didn't Ratface Reid say he was in favor of increasing the troop level in Iraq? Typically, he flip-flopped, and now is against it. Partisan politics, as usual. You can always tell a Democrat. They all have windburned index fingers. Democrats like Joe Biden are pushing to advance a non-binding and symbolic resolution to show their contempt of the plan to increase the troop levels in Iraq. Such shallow tactics reflect the fact that Democrats lack substance, have no standards and are devoid of values. The only relevant thing to a Democrat is to maintain power, increase POWer, and to never relinquish POWER. They are willing to endure any sacrifice, make up any falsehood, stab anyone in the back, witness another domestic attack by our enemies-in short, absorb any cost-to maintain power. They will discard anyone or anything that hinders their quest. Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman will attest to that. The Democratic Party is a contrived organization, which has no core values and stand for...uhhhhhh...NOTHING. They are like Mighty Mouse in New York City on Thanksgiving morning...something that looks powerful and right, but in reality is just a bag of gas. In closing, consider this. Western civilization has been engaged in warfare with the Moslem world for hundreds of years. That is a fact. The Crusades were among the conflicts between the two ideologies. Arab nations have been attempting world domination for all these hundreds and hundreds of years. Jihad is a reality. Jihad is a religion that states you, YOU, must either be a Moslem, or you must be dead. It is a holy war. If we wait for a Democrat to lead us in an effort to stop the Moslem world, we might as well put our head on the chopping block and avoid all the trouble. And, if the United States is not willing to stand up to the Moslem world, WHO WILL???? Do you think Germany, France or England will stop them? If we don't stop tiptoeing around the fact that these people want to K I L L us, and start treating this war like it's a war, we're dead. If we don't stop shooting ourselves in the foot, and handicapping our armed forces in their efforts to win, we're walking dead people. That is a fact, and Democrats better stop their treasonous antics and start facing reality.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 10:14 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 24, 2007

Who Needs a Crystal Ball?

An adversary is more hurt by desertion than by slaughter.
Vegetius

Well, the end is near, I fear. The Democrats are high-fiving each other over their treasonous victories, the Republicans are pointing fingers, and there is absolutely no good Conservative leaders anywhere to be found. Giuliani and McCain are the front-runners for the Republican Party, and Clinton is "running to win." If either Giuliani or McCain wins the nomination, the Republicans will lose the election and we'll be mired under another eight years with a Clinton in the White House, a fate second only to a surrender to Islam. Americans refuse to fight their enemies, the Chinese are stealing our oil from the Gulf of Mexico, Mexicans are victoriously invading our nation, Chavez is still ranting about how evil America is, and Iran is going to have the nuke soon, ready to destroy America and Israel. Democrats are all smiles because they have just about ensured that we will lose the war on terror, we are going to have huge tax increases rammed down our throats, their war on "big oil" will ensure we pay over $3.00 a gallon at the pump, and the economy will be destroyed, but few people realize or care, because the most important thing in their teeney little lives is "American Idol." The minimum wage will increase, meaning increased prices for everybody on every product you buy, rent or lease. College students don't know who the Secretay of State is, but knows every word of the latest rap song. I watched the Democrats after the State of the Union address fighting to get pictures taken with President Bush, even though they hate his guts. I watched Democrats sitting on their hands while President Bush talked about saving us from the terrorists. I remember when President Bush warned us the war would be long and hard, with victories unseen and heroes unknown. All irrelevant to Democrats. They will drag us into abject defeat, and scream when the terrorists hit us again that Bush failed to protect us. They refuse victory, and embrace defeat. After 9-11, they stood toe-to-toe to tell us that Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and were a threat. Now, Bush lied and they want out. I'm about sick to death with the whole thing. We're going to have socialized medicine, socialized education and socialized welfare for everybody. Maybe a couple of nukes going off will wake people up to what's going on here. Hillary will be President, she will have hit squads out to rid her of her enemies, Bill will be renting out the Lincoln Bedroom to more Chinese spies, they will be able to steal all the china from the White House again, and trash Air Force One. Bill will be able to corner another sweet young thing in the Oval Office, and enjoy a fine cigar, and Hillary will play dumb when some White House advisor is found dead in a small park somewhere around Washington. Hillary will be able to find such fine Cabinet people such as Sandy Burglar and Jocelyn Elders. It'll be the good ol' days revisited, only it will be Hillary standing up to the terrorists. Gee, that gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. She couldn't stop her philandering husband. OK, you lousy Democrats, you got what you wanted. Now, enjoy the sleeze coming down the road for all of us.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 02:48 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 23, 2007

Democrats and Socialists are Indistinguishable

To those that flee come neither power nor glory.
Homer

Here is a link to the World Socialist Website.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/jan2007/iraq-j23.shtmlTake a few minutes and read what the official Socialist view of the war on Iraq is. While reading this, remind yourself that a committed Socialist wrote it, not the Senate office of Harry Ratface Reid or the House office of Nancy Pigface Pelosi. Keep in mind that Democrats bristle at having their patriotism questioned. Remind yourself that this piece was not written by the New York Times or the Washington Times. This was written by committed Socialists. Remind yourself also that Reid, Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Kerry, Kucinich and all the rest of these bums are ALSO committed Socialists. This is the truth whether you admit it or not. Bill Clinton was also a Socialist. Lockstep Liberals, the feel gooders, the idealists who stand for nothing solid, support the enemy that real Americans oppose. Yes, it is correct and proper to question a Democrat's patriotism. They don't have any.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 09:10 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 17, 2007

Harry Reid Takes Lessons From Chavez

Today's quote for Democrats to heed...

Armed forces abroad are of little value without prudent counsel at home.
Cicero

Typical of socialists the world over, if your opposition is opinionated against you, you do what is necessary to silent your enemies. The similarities between Chavez and Radio Caracas and the Democrats intentions to silent Conservative talk radio is nothing short of spectacular. As he moves closer to pure socialism, Chavez has declared war on freedom of speech in Venezuela, similar to the war soon to be engaged in by socialist Democrats here in America. Chavez has decided that Venezuela's oldest TV station must go off the air on May 28. Their days are numbered. Squeal, kick, whatever they do: the license of that fascist channel is gone," Chavez said Saturday. "RCTV's signal will be nationalized for Venezuelans," says Chavez. Another similarity to Democrats, you must label your opposition as fascists. Democrats do that all the time. The move against RCTV won't likely end Chavez's efforts to rewrite the rules that govern Venezuela's airwaves. Another frequent forum for opposition views is 24-hour all-news channel Globovision. Without elaborating, Telecommunications Minister Jesse Chacon said authorities want to set up "a structure in which the media owner isn't the owner of 24-hour messages, 365 days a year." RCTV, Globovision and two other channels are what Chavez has called the "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse." He has accused RCTV of one-sided coverage and said the channels effectively supported a short-lived 2002 attempted coup by broadcasting cartoons and movies instead of the street protests that aided his return to power. Pro-Chavez mobs gathered outside RCTV and other stations during the coup, shouting insults and in some cases hurling rocks. Two of those four channels have since toned down their criticism, while RCTV and Globovision have stayed their course despite sometimes-violent demonstrations. During pro-Chavez protests in 2004, an Associated Press reporter watched as a Chavez supporter fired shots at RCTV's studios while others rammed an ice cream truck into the wall, then set the truck afire. So, get ready, folks. If the Democrats get their way, we will soon be experiencing the same future here in the "land of the free." Socialist Democrats will be doing their very best to shut down all opposing views to their illegal and immoral behavior.

Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 11:14 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 16, 2007

Fourteen Members of Carter Center's Advisory Board Resign

Jimmy Carter's new book, "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid," contains many serious factual mistakes and his opinions expressed within the pages don't address the actual reality of Israel's security concerns. On Thursday, January 11, 2007 fourteen members of his advisory board resigned, telling Carter in a letter, "We can no longer endorse your strident and uncompromising position. This is not the Carter Center or the Jimmy Carter we came to respect and support." Last month, a fellow at the Carter Center named Ken Stein turned in his resignation in which he said that the book was "replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions and simply invented segments." Carter has built up a reputation over the years as a man dedicated to saving lives in the Middle East and bringing peace to the area. In typical Liberal gobbledegoop, he refuses to deal with reality, and instead makes up facts and figures to fit his perception of reality. Liberals do this in everything they concern themselves with, from global warming to minimum wage to the war in Iraq. Forget the facts, go with your fuzzy-wuzzy feelings, and don't offend anyone. The present failing of Carter to address reality is a perfect example of the entire Liberal population which has been infected with simpering stupidity. Carter's type of lunacy is getting so far from reality that even fellow looney Libs who have supported him are finally realizing that his brand of Liberalism is far from reality. Carter is obsessed with a desire to save lives in the Middle East, but fails to address the present lunatic who is the President of Iran desiring to wipe Israel off the map. Iran is also presently embarked on a rush to gain a nuclear weapon, and when they possess it, they willl use it before the paint dries. Recently, Israel gave up all of Gaza in an effort to generate a peace in the region. The Palestinian response was to launch over 1200 rockets into Israel. It is nothing short of amazing that so many people in this country forget that 3000 of their countrymen were murdered for the crime of being Americans. Where we used stand together in righteous anger to oppression and tyranny, we now cower as simpering cowards. Instead of showing a solid wall of defiance to our would-be killers, we point fingers and slink into dark corners, blaming the people who work to protect us of being warmongers and fools. Stupid Liberals refuse to see the fact that negotiating and pleading with monsters for peace only entices them to sharpen their swords. United Nations sanctions have never stopped a terrorist, and it never will. Only a bullet stops terrorism. Until we bleed from a life-threatening wound, and Liberals face actual death at the hands of our enemies, they will continue to whine and blame and point fingers at the ones who stand between them and the knife at their throats.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 02:04 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 13, 2007

Today's Humor...I think...

Many will recall that on July 8, 1947, witnesses claimed that an unidentified object with five aliens aboard crashed onto a sheep and cattle ranch just outside Roswell, New Mexico. This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the U.S. Air Force and the federal government.
However, what you may NOT know is that in the month of March 1948, exactly nine months after that historic day, the following people were born:
Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.
Hillary Rodham
John F. Kerry
william Jefferson Clinton
Howard Dean
Nancy Pelosi
Dianne Feinstein
Charles E. Schumer
Barbara Boxer
See what happens when aliens breed with sheep? This piece of information may clear up a lot of things.

Thanks to Greg W.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 10:34 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 12, 2007

Category 4 Hurricane and Category 5 Snowstorm...A Comparison in Sanity

http://www.usatoday.com/weather/storms/2006-12-29-snowstorm_x.htm?csp=34 Check it out...

Denver, Colorado has suffered through a snowstorm of epic proportions recently. Cars are stranded in snow drifts of up to ten feet deep. More snow is on the way, and up to 24 more inches may pile on top of the 44 inches already accumulated. Winds howl at over 90 MPH, snapping trees and power poles like matchsticks. Hundreds of motorists are stranded, and thousands of residents are without electrical power. The area blasted by this storm is at least as large as the area devestated by Katrina. The media coverage of this disaster, however, is quite different. George Bush did not leave Washington to visit the area. FEMA has not responded at all. There has been no coverage of rioting or looting because it hasn't happened. The mayor of Denver didn't go whining for help, and he didn't use federal personnel and equipment for personal and illegal activities. Neither Jesse Jackson nor Al Sharpton arrived to interject their usual racial rants. Governor Bill Owens, a Republican, naturally, did not blame President Bush or FEMA for failure to do their jobs. CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC failed to visit or report on this category 5 snowstorm. No one has received, nor will they receive, a $2,000 debit card to provide instant gratification for illicit activities. No one has asked for, nor will they receive, a FEMA house trailer to live in. No stores or business districts have been struck by rioters or looters. No one expected the federal government to "rescue" them. Larry King, Oprah, Chris Matthews, Geraldo, Shaun Penn, Barbara Streisand, George Clooney, Alec Baldwin and all the other Liberal Hollywood knotheads have not uttered a peep. Truck owners have rescued stranded motorists by pulling their vehicles from the snowdrifts without being paid a cent for their time or for their concern. Local restaurants provided food which the local police and fire departments delivered it to people stuck in buildings all over the area. The people of Colorado, which happens to be a "red state," knew that they needed to depend on themselves to get out of the mess, not some government agency. A local resident of the area was quoted as saying, " I have noticed that once one gets north of about 48 degrees North Latitude, 90% of the world's social problems evaporate." I'll bet if people were to visit the Denver area in a year or so, the devastation wrought from this fierce and deadly storm will be all cleaned up, because the people who live there will depend on themselves to get the situation under control. I'm sure if you go to New Orleans ten years from now, the people will still be sitting around with their thumbs in an awkward place waiting for the government to bail them out. Such is the difference between a RED state and a BLUE state.
Marshal Will Kane

Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 01:44 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 11, 2007

President Bush's "Escalation" of the War in Iraq

I get a kick out of the way Liberals choose a word or phrase to hammer their opposition and proceed to have it issue forth from every Liberal mouth. Today's word is "escalation." The intention is to try to portray President Bush's policy toward Iraq as an enlargement of the war because he wants to send in an additional 20000 troops. The first day the Reid-Pelosi regime took over, they sent a letter to the President telling him they intended to block reinforcements to Iraq, regardless of the consequences to our men and women in harm's way. This document is one of the most shameful documents in the history of our national government...no small accomplishment. The Pelosi-Reid cohorts claimed to want to "do everything we can to help Iraq succeed in the future." They claimed that adding more combat troops would only "endanger more Americans and stretch our military to the breaking point for no strategic gain." They said the "way forward is to begin the phased redeployment of our forces in the next 4 to 6 months..." and called for a "renewed diplomatic strategy..." "In short, it is time to begin to move our forces out of Iraq...it is time to bring the war to a close." Here is where their true hipocrisy shows. T