February 08, 2007
Islamic Invocation at Dem's National Committee Meeting has Consequences
Robert Spencer, one of the America's foremost experts on Islam, says members of the Democratic National Committee may have been ignorant what the words meant when an Islamic imam recently gave the invocation at the party's 2007 winter meeting. One of the nation's leading experts on the Islamic religion says those in attendance at the Democratic National Committee's 2007 winter meeting were apparently unaware of what an Islamic imam was really saying when he gave the invocation. Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch, a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, says the imam from a Shiite Muslim mosque in Dearborn, Michigan, essentially asked Allah to assist in converting the party members to Islam. But "because they don't know anything about Islam," says Spencer, those at the meeting do not realize the words used by the iman "don't mean the same thing to non-Muslims that they mean to Muslims -- and this is what fools them." According to Spencer, the imam spoke of being guided to a "straight path," which -- to a Muslim -- is the path of Islam. Explaining further, he says in traditional Islamic theology it is the Jews who have incurred God's anger and the Christians who have gone astray, and both must be guided to that "straight path." Spencer says the DNC is obsessed with multi-culturalism. He suggests it is highly unlikely that the Democrats would have asked a Christian to deliver the invocation at their meeting. But he says it is even more unlikely that they would have remained silent if the Christian leader had spoken as the imam did.
Marshal Will Kane
Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:41 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
February 01, 2007
Today's Humor
The Pope took a couple of days off to visit the Rugged Mountains of Alaska for some sightseeing. He was cruising along the campground in the Pope Mobile when there was a frantic commotion just at the edge of the woods. A helpless Democrat, wearing sandals, shorts, a "Save the Whales" hat, and a "To Hell with Bush" T-shirt, was screaming while struggling frantically and thrashing around trying to free himself from the grasp of a 10-foot grizzly. As the Pope watched in horror, a group of Republican loggers came racing up. One quickly fired a 44 magnum into the bear's chest. The other two reached up and pulled the bleeding, semiconscious Democrat from the bear's grasp. Then using long clubs, the three loggers finished off the bear and two of them threw it onto the bed of their truck while the other tenderly placed the injured Democrat in the back seat. As they prepared to leave, the Pope summoned them to come over. "I give you my blessing for your brave actions!" he told them. "I heard there was a bitter hatred between Republican loggers and Democratic Environmental activists but now I've seen with my own eyes that this is not true." As the Pope drove off, one of the loggers asked his buddies "Who was that guy?" "It was the Pope," another replied. "He's in direct contact with Heaven and has access to all wisdom." "Well," the logger said, "he may have access to all wisdom but he sure doesn't know anything about Grizzly bear hunting! By the way, is the bait holding up, or do we need to go back to Massachusetts and get another one?
Thanks to Alan and Janet
Marshal Will Kane
Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:13 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
January 06, 2007
John Kerry Testimony
In my daily battle with Liberals, it has been said to me that the entire story about John Kerry's traitorous behavior before the Senate is a made up bunch of lies, and he never said the things that have been quoted as his words. This is typical Liberal lying. For anyone who has an interest in the real truth, check this out. It is very long, but makes interesting viewing, if you can keep your food down while watching.
http://www.shortfamilyonline.com/life/files/john-kerry-1971-testimony/1971Kerry.wmv
Marshal Will Kane
Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 10:41 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
December 03, 2006
A Little Laughter
An Indian walks into a cafe with a shotgun
in one hand pulling a male buffalo with the other.
He says to the waiter:
"Want coffee."
The waiter says, "Sure, Chief. Coming right up."
He gets the Indian a tall mug of coffee.
The Indian drinks the coffee down in one gulp,
turns and blasts the buffalo with the shotgun,
causing parts of the animal to splatter everywhere
and then just walks out.
The next morning the Indian returns.
He has his shotgun in one hand, pulling
another male buffalo with the other.
He walks up to the counter and says to
the waiter
"Want coffee."
The waiter says "Whoa, Tonto!
We're still cleaning up your mess from yesterday. What was all that about, anyway?"
The Indian smiles and proudly says ...
"Training for position in United States Congress come January.
Come in, drink coffee, shoot the bull,
leave mess for others to clean up,
disappear for rest of day."
Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 07:15 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 16, 2006
A Little Laughter: The Difference Between Left and Right:
A Little Laughter
The Difference Between Left and Right:
One day a florist goes to a barber for a haircut. After the cut he asked about his bill and the barber replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The florist is pleased and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open his shop. There is a thank you card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door. Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept ! Money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The cop is happy and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open up there is a thank you card and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door. Later a Republican comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The Republican is very happy and leaves the shop. Next morning when the barber goes to open, there is a thank you card and a dozen different books such as "How to Improve Your Business" and "Becoming More Successful." Then a Democrat comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay his bill the barber again replies: "I'm sorry, I cannot accept money from you; I'm doing community service this week." The Democrat is very happy and leaves the shop. The next morning when the barber goes to open up, there are a dozen Democrats lined up waiting for a free haircut. And that, my friends, illustrates the fundamental difference between left and right...
Thanks to my old Navy pal Mike C. in the Vampire State, New York
Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 08:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 21, 2006
There Are No Terrorists in Iraq!
The Democrats have opted for a new attack policy to hit the Republicans with. Their old theme, "Culture of Corruption," didn't float because It was Democrat politicians such as Mayor Nagen and Congressman William Jefferson who were the corrupted ones. So, Ratface Reid has hit on a new attack plan...the brilliant idea that the war in Iraq is not a part of the war on terror. Gee, Ratface, this is really a brilliant attack plan. I'm sure this is going to have the Republicans cringing and running for cover. But, ahhh...ummmm...it's just a minor detail, but...if memory serves me correctly...didn't a federal trial judge named Harold Baer Jr., who was appointed by that lovable rascal Bill Clinton, examine legally admitted evidence of Iraq's duplicity in the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and assessed over one hundred MILLION dollars in damages? Come on, Ratface, this guy is one of your own cronies, so you can't scream foul play, either. But, maybe you can ignore this little problem with your plan. No one probably remembers, anyway. You can probably just sweep it under the rug like you always do. And that other little matter...ummm...gee, didn't Clinton's administration classify Iraq as a sponsor of terrorism because Mr. Hussein's government gave sanctuary and support to terrorist organizations? That would be during the 1990's when Mr. Uprightandmoral Clinton was a squatter in the White House. I'm sure with a few dollars in hush money, you can make that little problem go away, too. Speaking of money, I'm sure very few people remember that Saddam paid families of suicide bombers anywhere from $10,000 to $40,000 to have little Ahmad exit the world in a brilliant flash of lightning while screaming Allah somethingorother. Which brings to mind...ahhh...what's his name...Yasin...yeah, Abdul Rahman Yasin...there's a name that goes back a ways...1993, to be exact. Yep, pardner, he was an al-Qaida member who lived in Iraq in a home given to him by Saddam himself. Saddam even paid him a salary. All that payback and all he ever did was construct the bomb that was detonated at the World Trade Center in that year. And then there's Ramzi Yousef. You remember Ramzi, don't you? He was the chief planner of the of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the nephew of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, a kingpin of the infamous 9/11 attacks. Yousef came to America on an Iraqi passport. Golly, Ratface, seems like these little items could be considered as links between Iraq and international terrorism. Another minor point. Why don't we talk about what you Democrats said about Iraq and terrorism? Would you like to see your own words?
If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -Bill Clinton
"For too long we've been told about "us" and "them." Each and every election we see a new slate of arguments and ads telling us that "they" are the problem, not "us." But there can be no "them" in America. There's only us."
-- Bill Clinton (This one really gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling. It proves how Democrats are unconscionable liars. Jimmy Carter really knows how to relate to this one.)
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Sept. 27, 2002. (Many years...tch...tch...tch)
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D- MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D- MA), Jan. 23. 2003
I really love this internet that Al Gore so brilliantly invented!!! It is so easy to track Liberal Democrat lies and misstatements. You'd think they would smarten up some. But that is just my opinion.
Posted by Marshal Will Kane at 06:22 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 18, 2005
How I Hate the Heathen Left (Part 2)
I’m feeling venomous. When I feel overwhelmed with the sheer amount of injustice in the world, I just do one of these numbers:
I hated that I was ineligible for financial aid for five years of college because, being a non-conventional returning student, I had a job, I was white, I did not have any children or pay child support, and my wife also had a job.
I hated that we struggled to pay rent, car payments, and insurance while certain other students had their rent, car, and daycare paid for them so they could attend college (and not bother to go to class).
I hate that I had to borrow money for school and now (four years later) I’m still saddled with paying student loans off.
I hate that 20% of my earnings are stolen every pay period by the federal government (that makes it harder to pay off the student loans that the same federal government refused to subsidize on the grounds that I was white, employed, and married).
I hate that, despite what I pay in federal taxes, my government refuses to stop violent, diseased people from crossing our borders illegally.
I hate paying taxes.
I hate the Travelocity gnome (I just know that little rat bastard is a hippie liberal).
I hate that politicians and the AARP can openly lie to senior citizens and not face criminal charges.
I hate communist Italian journalists with anti-American sentiments.
I hate The United Nations and all of the pig-headed, socialist, one-world, baby raping, self-aggrandizing propaganda they stand for.
I hate filibusters where filibusters don’t belong.
Did I mention I hate paying taxes?
I hate the people who say it is cruel and unusual to kill a convicted murderer and then turn around and claim it is a woman’s right to kill a defenseless baby.
I hate when people who pretend for a living (Hollywood not Washington) feel they have a mandate to preach politics.
I hate when all my ammunition is spent.
I hate that nobody talks about Michael Moore anymore. It was oh so easy, entertaining, and enjoyable to make fun of that fat ass.
I hate Hillary Clinton.
I hate marshmallows.
Okay, that about sums it up for now. If this blog gets too hateful too fast, my readers might get the bends.
Posted by RobF at 04:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 16, 2005
When Animals Eat Their Young
Proof again that, despite their claim to cherish and protect First Amendment rights, when faced with rhetoric that goes against their Stalinist philosophy, liberals will often consume their own kind.
Posted by RobF at 10:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 15, 2005
The Facts, They are A-Changin
The New York Times has shamelessly contradicted itself in regards to the once non-existent weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. They now report that Iraqi official, Sami al-Araji, the deputy minister of industry claims that intense looting and moving of materials capable of developing WMDs occurred after US occupation and the fall of Saddam Hussein.
So let me get this straight. Throughout the duration of the war, the liberal establishment, spearheaded by the New York Times, has criticized the war in Iraq as a blood thirsty imperialistic war waged over oil while boobs like Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and John Kerry screamed bloody murder claiming that George Bush lied to the American people about the existence of WMDs in Iraq. The fact that there were satellite photographs showing convoys of trucks carrying unknown cargo into Syria just before the invasion was largely ignored by the mainstream media. The existence of terrorist training grounds in Iraq (Salman Pac) was also quietly swept under the rug. The comparison of George Bush to Adolph Hitler has been made so many times it has almost ceased to defile the sensibilities of those of us with even a scrap of respect for the leader of the free world. Now, after the New York Times and the majority of the mainstream media buffoons have done their bloody best to drag George Bush through the mud in front of the whole world, they are claiming that the once non-existent weapons of mass destruction were moved from Iraqi sites while under the control of U.S. troops.
Why? I believe the explanation is simple. After a brilliant and efficient campaign waged by our troops resulting in the fall of the incessantly brutal Baathist regime in Iraq anxious (and don’t think Hussein wasn’t anxious) to produce weapons capable of killing hundreds of thousands of innocents, the filthy left is positioning themselves before the evidence is made available. Someone knows something tangible in regard to the existence of WMDs in Iraq and the NYT and the Democratic Party are attempting to make it look like George Bush and the U.S. Military are responsible for unleashing these weapons on the world before the cat is out of the bag. I’ve said it in the past, and I’ll say it again. Regardless of the paltry lip service they pay to supporting the troops, they will never support anything the U.S. Military does or accomplishes. They have simply learned to be politically correct in their disdain. Instead of calling heroes baby killers (which the most radical amongst them still do) they strive to point out their incompetence.
I’ll bet dollars to donuts that Syria is feeling the heat and word has gotten out about the so-called smoking gun. Anyone with a lick of common sense knows that Saddam Hussein was doing everything in his power to get his hands on nuclear and chemical weapons. The MSM and the lunatic left just couldn’t resist the underhanded political power that was harnessed prior to the Presidential election by claiming that there were no WMDs long before all of the evidence was in. Now the chickens are coming home to roost and the New York Times is the first in what I believe will be a long list of leftist organizations, including the Democratic Party, that will attempt to position themselves in such a way as to fool people into forgetting their falsely based anti-war stance and pre-election power grab and focus on accusing the Bush Administration of fumbling weapons of mass destruction into the hands of the terrorists.
Despicable…
Posted by RobF at 12:11 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 02, 2005
Hearts and Minds
The Supreme Court has taken another step toward eradicating self accountability by ruling that juvenile execution (those between 16 and 18 years of age) violates the Eighth Amendment's provision against cruel and unusual punishment under the "evolving standards of decency" test.
The same liberal ideology that fosters this sympathetic train of thought toward juvenile murderers also encourages handing out condoms in schools instead of teaching the benefits of abstinence. They support teenage abortion and, in some cases, would allow students to leave school to have an abortion without parental consent. They would have you believe that juveniles have some constitutionally protected right to privacy. So, in essence, the heathen left claims that juveniles are accountable for their own actions when it comes to having sex and aborting babies but they are not responsible for their own actions when they have needlessly and maliciously taken the life of another.
The liberal agenda skates self accountability time and time again because their politics play to the heart and not the mind. To a liberal, the substance of a situation is not what common sense dictates, it’s how the situation makes you feel. With that in mind, I’m going to leave the logical argument behind and focus on the emotional. More often than we like to admit, our society places emphasis on protecting the perpetrator. Unless the victim of violent crime happens to be a young child, we rarely learn about them and we almost never hear about their family and loved ones. I believe that emotion does play a large role in punishing violent offenders but the emphasis should remain on the victims and their loved ones, not on the perpetrators. If one of my loved ones had their life needlessly taken by another human being, I would be unable to rationalize any punishment other than death. Victims of violent crimes and their families deserve an eye for an eye. They deserve retribution, regardless of the age, gender, race, or social status of the perpetrator. The Supreme Court is denying justice to innocent victims based on the year the perpetrator was born. They rule on the basis of what feels right in regard to the perpetrator, not what is right in regard to the victim.
Posted by RobF at 12:59 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
February 21, 2005
Amnesty's Alternate Reality
Leave it to a heathen left organization to claim that women’s freedoms are being violated in a place where, before liberation by the United States, there was no such thing as freedom and government control was enforced with chemical weapons, wood chippers, rape rooms, and other such brutalities.
Posted by RobF at 03:26 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
January 21, 2005
How I Hate the Heathen Left (Part I)
This will have to be a regular feature on C&L. Whenever I’m sick to death of attempting to wrap my brain around the illogical arguments and dirty tactics of those damn democrats, I’ll just spew hate. That’s what conservatives are supposed to do right? Don’t let the heathen left tell you that hate is always bad. Go ahead, take a bite. Mmmmm, HATE. Go on, have another.
I hate how they look down their nose at you because they think they’re right and you’re just not smart enough to understand the concept.
I hate their idea that what is best for everyone isn’t necessarily what’s best for them - double standards.
I hate that they think everyone who doesn’t agree with their ideology is an extremist.
I hate how they fight for the right to murder millions of unborn children in the name of “choice”.
I hate their refusal to accept that force is sometimes necessary in the real world unless a Democratic President gave the consent to use said force.
I hate their plan to redistribute wealth to those who have done nothing to earn that wealth.
I hate their tendency to discriminate on the basis of race.
I hate their vendetta against the teachings of Jesus Christ and those who worship him and choose to live by his principles.
I hate their efforts to remove the concept, “self accountability” from our society.
I hate their animosity toward the very country that gives them the freedom to act out.
I hate their efforts to construct situations that do not exist for political gain.
I hate their efforts to deconstruct the sanctity of marriage.
I hate their refusal to accept defeat.
I hate how they use the public education system to pawn their agenda off on unsuspecting innocent children without their parent’s consent.
I hate how a Democrat’s free speech is a constitutional right while a Republican’s free speech is an assault on their sensitivities.
I hate that they want to take away my right to keep and bear arms.
I hate that they think that the life of an endangered animal is more important than the life of a human being.
Posted by RobF at 01:17 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
